TY - JOUR
T1 - Wittgensteins Manuskriptbände aus dem Jahr 1929
T2 - Überlegungen zur Chronologie von MSS 105-107
AU - Figueiredo, Florian Franken
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00183%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F00183%2F2020/PT#
UIDB/00183/2020
UIDP/00183/2020
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Wittgenstein's manuscript volumes from 1929: Reflections on the Chronology of MSS 105-107. In this paper I identify the evidence that might be used to establish a viable chronology for Wittgenstein's writing of his manuscript volumes 105-107 and sections thereof. Since Wittgenstein omits to date his entries in these three 1929 volumes between February 15 and September 11, the evaluation of these different chronologies must remain somewhat speculative, but the justifications for each can, as I will show, be revealingly compared. I also argue that such attempts at a genealogical appreciation of Wittgenstein's remarks is not only worthwhile on its own terms but it also further paves the way for an increased understanding of Wittgenstein's philosophy. I articulate and evaluate three possible chronologies for the year 1929 and argue for the one I take to be the most plausible.
AB - Wittgenstein's manuscript volumes from 1929: Reflections on the Chronology of MSS 105-107. In this paper I identify the evidence that might be used to establish a viable chronology for Wittgenstein's writing of his manuscript volumes 105-107 and sections thereof. Since Wittgenstein omits to date his entries in these three 1929 volumes between February 15 and September 11, the evaluation of these different chronologies must remain somewhat speculative, but the justifications for each can, as I will show, be revealingly compared. I also argue that such attempts at a genealogical appreciation of Wittgenstein's remarks is not only worthwhile on its own terms but it also further paves the way for an increased understanding of Wittgenstein's philosophy. I articulate and evaluate three possible chronologies for the year 1929 and argue for the one I take to be the most plausible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171736113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001108482800009
U2 - 10.1515/witt-2023-0006
DO - 10.1515/witt-2023-0006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85171736113
SN - 1868-7431
VL - 14
SP - 95
EP - 111
JO - Wittgenstein-Studien
JF - Wittgenstein-Studien
IS - 1
ER -