Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Rabern and Rabern (Analysis 68:105–112 2 ) and Uzquiano (Analysis 70:39–44 4 ) have each presented increasingly harder versions of ‘the hardest logic puzzle ever’ (Boolos The Harvard Review of Philosophy 6:62–65 1 ), and each has provided a two-question solution to his predecessor’s puzzle. But Uzquiano’s puzzle is different from the original and different from Rabern and Rabern’s in at least one important respect: it cannot be solved in less than three questions. In this paper we solve Uzquiano’s puzzle in three questions and show why there is no solution in two. Finally, to cement a tradition, we introduce a puzzle of our own.
Original languageUnknown
Pages (from-to)493-503
JournalJournal Of Philosophical Logic
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Cite this