TY - JOUR
T1 - Why do people migrate irregularly?
T2 - Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in West Africa
AU - Bah, Tijan L.
AU - Batista, Catia
N1 - Funding text: funding support from Nova SBE and the European Doctorate Degree NOVAFRICA. Bah acknowledges funding and support from Economics - Erasmus Mundus (EDE-EM) Program
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Irregular migration to Europe by sea, though risky, remains one of the most popular migration options for many sub-Saharan Africans. This study examines the determinants of irregular migration from West Africa to Europe. We implemented an incentivized lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Gambia, the country with the region’s highest rate of irregular migration to Europe. Male youths aged 15 to 25 were given hypothetical scenarios regarding the probability of dying en route to Europe and of gaining legal residence status after successful arrival. According to the data we collected, potential migrants overestimate both the risk of dying en route to Europe and the probability of obtaining legal residency status. In this context, our experimental results show that providing potential migrants with official numbers on the probability of getting a legal residence permit decreases their likelihood of migration by 2.88 percentage points (pp), while information on the death risk of migrating increases their likelihood of migration by 2.29 pp—although the official numbers should be regarded as a lower bound to actual mortality. Follow-up data collected one year after the experiment show that the migration decisions reported in the lab experiment correlate well with actual migration decisions and intentions. Overall, our study indicates that the migration decisions of potential migrants are likely to respond to relevant information.
AB - Irregular migration to Europe by sea, though risky, remains one of the most popular migration options for many sub-Saharan Africans. This study examines the determinants of irregular migration from West Africa to Europe. We implemented an incentivized lab-in-the-field experiment in rural Gambia, the country with the region’s highest rate of irregular migration to Europe. Male youths aged 15 to 25 were given hypothetical scenarios regarding the probability of dying en route to Europe and of gaining legal residence status after successful arrival. According to the data we collected, potential migrants overestimate both the risk of dying en route to Europe and the probability of obtaining legal residency status. In this context, our experimental results show that providing potential migrants with official numbers on the probability of getting a legal residence permit decreases their likelihood of migration by 2.88 percentage points (pp), while information on the death risk of migrating increases their likelihood of migration by 2.29 pp—although the official numbers should be regarded as a lower bound to actual mortality. Follow-up data collected one year after the experiment show that the migration decisions reported in the lab experiment correlate well with actual migration decisions and intentions. Overall, our study indicates that the migration decisions of potential migrants are likely to respond to relevant information.
KW - Expectations
KW - Information
KW - International migration
KW - Irregular migration
KW - Lab-in-the-Field Experiment
KW - The Gambia
KW - Willingness to migrate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087846731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087846731
VL - 2020
SP - 1
EP - 40
JO - Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies
JF - Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies
IS - 435
ER -