When science meets strategic realpolitik: the case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit

Chris Carter, Stewart Clegg, Nils Wåhlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues that the impasse over tackling climate change at the 2009 climate change summit is a result of the outcome of the prevailing power and politics at the summit. The paper discusses the sociological literature on power and notes that the failure of the summit illustrates the fragility of legitimacy and authority. The paper rehearses key parts of the chronology of the summit and argues that the politics of domination often prevail over the politics of legitimacy. Moreover, the way in which both science and politics have failed to legitimate the issue of climate change is explored. The paper closes with a discussion of what is required to fix the issue as legitimate and meriting serious action by major international agencies and economies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)682-697
Number of pages16
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Institutional logics
  • Power
  • Summits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When science meets strategic realpolitik: the case of the Copenhagen UN climate change summit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this