TY - JOUR
T1 - When does power trigger approach motivation?
T2 - Threats and the role of perceived control in the power domain
AU - Deng, Mianlin
AU - Zheng, Mufan
AU - Guinote, Ana
N1 - Funding text: Preparation of this review was supported by the British Academy, grant nr. SG132223, and the Daedalus Trust grant nr. 520180 F67
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - It is widely believed that power activates the behavioral approach system (Guinote, ; Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, ); however, findings are inconsistent. Here we discuss evidence suggesting that perceived threats to control in the power domain are key determinants of the association between power and approach motivation. We propose that objective or subjective threats to the exercise of power trigger behavioral inhibition, conflicts between approach and behavioral inhibition, and reactive, negatively valenced approach motivation. Furthermore, threatened power holders reassert power-in particular by using coercion-as defense against threat. We discuss literature in support of these hypotheses involving external threats (e.g., instability, illegitimacy, and uncertainty) and subjective states (anxiety, motivation to maintain power, perceived incompetence, submissiveness, and perceptions of low power) that trigger the perception of lack of control in the power domain and undermine the positive tone of power holders' approach motivation.
AB - It is widely believed that power activates the behavioral approach system (Guinote, ; Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, ); however, findings are inconsistent. Here we discuss evidence suggesting that perceived threats to control in the power domain are key determinants of the association between power and approach motivation. We propose that objective or subjective threats to the exercise of power trigger behavioral inhibition, conflicts between approach and behavioral inhibition, and reactive, negatively valenced approach motivation. Furthermore, threatened power holders reassert power-in particular by using coercion-as defense against threat. We discuss literature in support of these hypotheses involving external threats (e.g., instability, illegitimacy, and uncertainty) and subjective states (anxiety, motivation to maintain power, perceived incompetence, submissiveness, and perceptions of low power) that trigger the perception of lack of control in the power domain and undermine the positive tone of power holders' approach motivation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046484392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/spc3.12390
DO - 10.1111/spc3.12390
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046484392
SN - 1751-9004
VL - 12
JO - Social and Personality Psychology Compass
JF - Social and Personality Psychology Compass
IS - 5
M1 - e12390
ER -