TY - JOUR
T1 - We have always been transreligious
T2 - An introduction to transreligiosity
AU - Panagiotopoulos, Anastasios
AU - Roussou, Eugenia
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04038%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04038%2F2020/PT#
UIDB/04038/2020
UIDP/04038/2020
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This article is a proposition and exploration of the term ‘transreligiosity’. We argue that transreligiosity is more apt to describe the transgressive character of religiosity, focusing more particularly on the transversality of spaces, symbolic or otherwise, which are created in religious phenomena. We examine the porosity of religious boundaries and, ultimately, propose the term transreligiosity to embrace them, placing emphasis on their transreligious character, while perceiving them as significant instantiations of transreligiosity. We take some of Latour’s key concepts on ‘purification’, to argue for the ultimate impossibility of it in the sphere of religiosity. While processes of purification have been powerful through efforts to institutionalize and centralize religiosity, at a vernacular level, this has had a contrary effect. Religious subjects have been distanced from a more direct participation (‘mediation’). Hence, they are constantly creating transreligious instances to abolish and transgress those rigid borders.
AB - This article is a proposition and exploration of the term ‘transreligiosity’. We argue that transreligiosity is more apt to describe the transgressive character of religiosity, focusing more particularly on the transversality of spaces, symbolic or otherwise, which are created in religious phenomena. We examine the porosity of religious boundaries and, ultimately, propose the term transreligiosity to embrace them, placing emphasis on their transreligious character, while perceiving them as significant instantiations of transreligiosity. We take some of Latour’s key concepts on ‘purification’, to argue for the ultimate impossibility of it in the sphere of religiosity. While processes of purification have been powerful through efforts to institutionalize and centralize religiosity, at a vernacular level, this has had a contrary effect. Religious subjects have been distanced from a more direct participation (‘mediation’). Hence, they are constantly creating transreligious instances to abolish and transgress those rigid borders.
KW - Bruno Latour
KW - Contemporary spirituality
KW - Transnational religion
KW - Transreligiosity
KW - Vernacular and lived religion
KW - Purification’
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133387976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00377686221103713
DO - 10.1177/00377686221103713
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133387976
SN - 0037-7686
VL - 69
SP - 614
EP - 630
JO - Social Compass
JF - Social Compass
IS - 4
ER -