Comparative Analysis of Customer Value Dimensions

Translated title of the contribution: Vartotojo vertybių dydžių lyginamoji analizė

Meysam Maleki, Eduard Shevtshenko, Virgílio António Cruz Machado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current research six dimensions of customer value, namely: quality, cost, time, customization, know-how, and respect for the environment are analyzed in the following industries: automotive, electronics, furniture, food, clothing, and pharmaceutical industry. The research uses inductive approach in which a theory is emerged from the empirical data and observations. The data collection phase benefits from a trade-off based design questionnaire, which was used to collect the comparative data from end customers for each pair of customer value dimension. Due to the pair-wise format of collected data, Friedman test is employed in data analysis phase, in order to prove the validity of dataset in generating meaningful results. Findings are categorized for each dimension of customer value, where the importance of each dimension in comparison with others is discussed. The study results in customer value coefficient for each value dimension in each industry. The proposed coefficient clarifies the priority of value dimensions in different industries based on the dataset. This coefficient enables practitioners to list the corresponding industry customer values in order of importance and support the decision making process in trade-off situation, when improvement of one customer value dimension causes in reduction of the others. The developed coefficient quantitatively states how to sacrifice one and improve another dimension in favour of customer value. In a nut shell, the authors suggest to apply the customer value coefficient for the analysis of customer preferences when trade-off among value dimensions is involved.

Original languageMultiple languages
Pages (from-to)488-495
Number of pages8
JournalEngineering Economics
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • customer value
  • comparative analysis
  • quality
  • cost
  • time
  • customization
  • know-how
  • respect for the environment
  • INDUSTRY
  • CUSTOMIZATION
  • PERFORMANCE
  • LOYALTY
  • IMPACT

Cite this

Maleki, Meysam ; Shevtshenko, Eduard ; Machado, Virgílio António Cruz. / Comparative Analysis of Customer Value Dimensions. In: Engineering Economics. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 488-495.
@article{8dfbc5f1527e407488e7f3ebfbf30cee,
title = "Comparative Analysis of Customer Value Dimensions",
abstract = "In the current research six dimensions of customer value, namely: quality, cost, time, customization, know-how, and respect for the environment are analyzed in the following industries: automotive, electronics, furniture, food, clothing, and pharmaceutical industry. The research uses inductive approach in which a theory is emerged from the empirical data and observations. The data collection phase benefits from a trade-off based design questionnaire, which was used to collect the comparative data from end customers for each pair of customer value dimension. Due to the pair-wise format of collected data, Friedman test is employed in data analysis phase, in order to prove the validity of dataset in generating meaningful results. Findings are categorized for each dimension of customer value, where the importance of each dimension in comparison with others is discussed. The study results in customer value coefficient for each value dimension in each industry. The proposed coefficient clarifies the priority of value dimensions in different industries based on the dataset. This coefficient enables practitioners to list the corresponding industry customer values in order of importance and support the decision making process in trade-off situation, when improvement of one customer value dimension causes in reduction of the others. The developed coefficient quantitatively states how to sacrifice one and improve another dimension in favour of customer value. In a nut shell, the authors suggest to apply the customer value coefficient for the analysis of customer preferences when trade-off among value dimensions is involved.",
keywords = "customer value, comparative analysis, quality, cost, time, customization, know-how, respect for the environment, INDUSTRY, CUSTOMIZATION, PERFORMANCE, LOYALTY, IMPACT",
author = "Meysam Maleki and Eduard Shevtshenko and Machado, {Virg{\'i}lio Ant{\'o}nio Cruz}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.3241",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "24",
pages = "488--495",
journal = "Engineering Economics",
issn = "1392-2785",
publisher = "KAUNAS UNIV TECHNOL",
number = "5",

}

Comparative Analysis of Customer Value Dimensions. / Maleki, Meysam; Shevtshenko, Eduard; Machado, Virgílio António Cruz.

In: Engineering Economics, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2013, p. 488-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Analysis of Customer Value Dimensions

AU - Maleki, Meysam

AU - Shevtshenko, Eduard

AU - Machado, Virgílio António Cruz

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the current research six dimensions of customer value, namely: quality, cost, time, customization, know-how, and respect for the environment are analyzed in the following industries: automotive, electronics, furniture, food, clothing, and pharmaceutical industry. The research uses inductive approach in which a theory is emerged from the empirical data and observations. The data collection phase benefits from a trade-off based design questionnaire, which was used to collect the comparative data from end customers for each pair of customer value dimension. Due to the pair-wise format of collected data, Friedman test is employed in data analysis phase, in order to prove the validity of dataset in generating meaningful results. Findings are categorized for each dimension of customer value, where the importance of each dimension in comparison with others is discussed. The study results in customer value coefficient for each value dimension in each industry. The proposed coefficient clarifies the priority of value dimensions in different industries based on the dataset. This coefficient enables practitioners to list the corresponding industry customer values in order of importance and support the decision making process in trade-off situation, when improvement of one customer value dimension causes in reduction of the others. The developed coefficient quantitatively states how to sacrifice one and improve another dimension in favour of customer value. In a nut shell, the authors suggest to apply the customer value coefficient for the analysis of customer preferences when trade-off among value dimensions is involved.

AB - In the current research six dimensions of customer value, namely: quality, cost, time, customization, know-how, and respect for the environment are analyzed in the following industries: automotive, electronics, furniture, food, clothing, and pharmaceutical industry. The research uses inductive approach in which a theory is emerged from the empirical data and observations. The data collection phase benefits from a trade-off based design questionnaire, which was used to collect the comparative data from end customers for each pair of customer value dimension. Due to the pair-wise format of collected data, Friedman test is employed in data analysis phase, in order to prove the validity of dataset in generating meaningful results. Findings are categorized for each dimension of customer value, where the importance of each dimension in comparison with others is discussed. The study results in customer value coefficient for each value dimension in each industry. The proposed coefficient clarifies the priority of value dimensions in different industries based on the dataset. This coefficient enables practitioners to list the corresponding industry customer values in order of importance and support the decision making process in trade-off situation, when improvement of one customer value dimension causes in reduction of the others. The developed coefficient quantitatively states how to sacrifice one and improve another dimension in favour of customer value. In a nut shell, the authors suggest to apply the customer value coefficient for the analysis of customer preferences when trade-off among value dimensions is involved.

KW - customer value

KW - comparative analysis

KW - quality

KW - cost

KW - time

KW - customization

KW - know-how

KW - respect for the environment

KW - INDUSTRY

KW - CUSTOMIZATION

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - LOYALTY

KW - IMPACT

U2 - 10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.3241

DO - 10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.3241

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 488

EP - 495

JO - Engineering Economics

JF - Engineering Economics

SN - 1392-2785

IS - 5

ER -