TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding the dynamic of rice farming systems in southern mozambique to improve production and benefits to smallholders
AU - Ismael, Fátima
AU - Mbanze, Aires Afonso
AU - Ndayiragije, Alexis
AU - Fangueiro, David
N1 - Funding Information#
Hidráulica de Chókwè, Empresa Pública (HICEP)#
Serviço Distrital de Actividades Económicas (SDAE)#
FCT-Fundacao para Ciecia e Tecnologia#
Grant ref SFRH/BD/128098/2016#
LEAF center with the project#
UID/AGR/04129/ 2020 (LEAF).
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge all institutions and individuals who contributed to this work. We especially acknowledge the following institutions: Hidráulica de Chókwè, Empresa Pública (HICEP) and Serviço Distrital de Actividades Económicas (SDAE), for their support to conduct the research with the smallholders. We also acknowledge the field assistants Alexandre Quetane, Pedrito Quetane, and Argêncio Mucavel, and all of the surveyed smallholder farmers in the CIS, as well as Marina Temudo, who provided important inputs and ideas. Paula Alves carried out thorough English grammar correction. We also acknowledge the Fun-dação para Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) of Portugal, which provided a scholarship to the first author (Ref no SFRH/BD/128098/2016) and support the LEAF center with the project UID/AGR/04129/ 2020 (LEAF).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Rice farming systems (RFSs) in southern Mozambique are very heterogeneous and diversified, which has implications for smallholders’ adoption of each RFS, as well as on rice production and productivity in the region. In this regard, it is important to understand: (i) which RFS typologies can be leveraged to improve rice production and productivity; (ii) the drivers for smallholder farmers’ decisions to adopt an RFS; and (iii) which policies/incentives could enhance existing RFSs. The present study was based on surveys of 341 smallholder rice farmers in the Chókwè Irrigation Scheme (CIS), southern Mozambique. Data on the productivity of rice, size of the herd, and total other crop types were used to frame the RFS typologies. A multinomial logit model (MLM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) were applied to determine the driver for each RFS, and predict the constraints for production and yield. Based on cluster analysis, four typologies of RFSs were identified: the subsistence farming system (FS), specialised rice FS, mixed crops FS, and rice–livestock FS. Farms with longer experience reported applying more fertiliser and seedlings per unit hectare. The availability of labour increased the likelihood of adopting the mixed crops FS and rice–livestock FS. Older households were more likely to adopt the subsistence FS, and live closer to the farming fields. Yield of rice was positively associated with inputs such as fertilisers, pesticides, and seedlings, as well as years of experience of the household. Our results suggest that smallholder farmers need more assistance and technical support to identify and adopt more productive and less costly RFSs in this region.
AB - Rice farming systems (RFSs) in southern Mozambique are very heterogeneous and diversified, which has implications for smallholders’ adoption of each RFS, as well as on rice production and productivity in the region. In this regard, it is important to understand: (i) which RFS typologies can be leveraged to improve rice production and productivity; (ii) the drivers for smallholder farmers’ decisions to adopt an RFS; and (iii) which policies/incentives could enhance existing RFSs. The present study was based on surveys of 341 smallholder rice farmers in the Chókwè Irrigation Scheme (CIS), southern Mozambique. Data on the productivity of rice, size of the herd, and total other crop types were used to frame the RFS typologies. A multinomial logit model (MLM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) were applied to determine the driver for each RFS, and predict the constraints for production and yield. Based on cluster analysis, four typologies of RFSs were identified: the subsistence farming system (FS), specialised rice FS, mixed crops FS, and rice–livestock FS. Farms with longer experience reported applying more fertiliser and seedlings per unit hectare. The availability of labour increased the likelihood of adopting the mixed crops FS and rice–livestock FS. Older households were more likely to adopt the subsistence FS, and live closer to the farming fields. Yield of rice was positively associated with inputs such as fertilisers, pesticides, and seedlings, as well as years of experience of the household. Our results suggest that smallholder farmers need more assistance and technical support to identify and adopt more productive and less costly RFSs in this region.
KW - Crop–livestock
KW - Farming systems
KW - Fertilisation
KW - Production and productivity of rice
KW - Small-holder farmers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107177308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/agronomy11051018
DO - 10.3390/agronomy11051018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107177308
SN - 2073-4395
VL - 11
JO - Agronomy
JF - Agronomy
IS - 5
M1 - 1018
ER -