Understanding pragmatic paradoxes: When contradictions become paralyzing and what to do about it

Miguel Pina e Cunha, Arménio Rego, Marco Berti, Ace Volkmann Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Integration of paradoxes (i.e., interdependent yet contradictory tensions such as stability and change, learning and performing, or the individual and the collective) have recently been recognized as sources of synergy and competitive advantage. When adequately navigated, paradoxes may promote innovation, which favors generative complementarities. However, not all paradoxes have such generative effects. Pragmatic paradoxes (i.e., managerially imposed contradictory demands that must be disobeyed to be obeyed) tend to create paralyzing catch-22 situations. Like weeds to a flower, pragmatic paradoxes may also grow alongside the generative type. We explore the conditions in which pragmatic paradoxes become invasive in organizations, identify their main characteristics and symptoms, discuss their roots, and recommend potential approaches to their eradication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-462
Number of pages10
JournalBusiness Horizons
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Catch-22
  • Kafkaesque
  • Organizational conflict
  • Paradoxes
  • Pragmatism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding pragmatic paradoxes: When contradictions become paralyzing and what to do about it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this