Abstract
This study sheds light on consumer demand for air travel in the pandemic context by proposing and evaluating a model that combines the personal and third-party beliefs on travel intentions (Theory of Planned Behaviour), as well as the perceived level of threat and familiarity (Protection Motivation Theory). The model is evaluated with a sample of 381 respondents from Portugal, into two groups: travellers vs. non-travellers. Our results provide evidence that for both groups, self-efficacy and social influence are positively associated with the intention to fly. On the other hand, for non-travellers, attitudinal preferences are negatively driven by response cost and level of fear. For the COVID travellers, familiarity positively affects their attitude toward flying. This study contributes to a shift in the paradigm of tourism and can be used by airline companies and tourism operators, deepening the understanding of customer motivation for air travelling during the pandemic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3871-3887 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Current Issues in Tourism |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 23 |
| Early online date | 23 Nov 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Dec 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Air travel
- Protection motivation theory
- Theory of planned behaviour
- Tourism
- Multi-group analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To board or not to board? Understanding the drivers of intention to fly during the COVID-19 crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver