Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The use of ASDAS to evaluate disease activity and response to treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis starting the first biological drug: Are ASAS recommendations being followed?

Mariana Emília Santos, Sofia Ramiro, Désirée van der Heijde, Robert Landewé, Ana Rita Cruz-Machado, Carla Campinho Ferreira, Carlos Marques-Gomes, Catarina Dantas Soares, Cláudia Miguel, Fernando Albuquerque, Frederico Martins, Lígia Silva, Helena Santos, Inês Almeida, Miguel Bernardes, Nikita Khmelinskii, Paula Valente, Pedro Miguel Teixeira, Susana Emídio Matias, Vanessa FragaFernando Pimentel-Santos, Jaime Branco, Alexandre Sepriano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the proportion of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had ASDAS calculated at baseline and at least once within two follow-up visits after starting their first bDMARD; and to evaluate the likelihood of meeting ASAS criteria for treatment continuation at 3 and 6 months. Methods: Patients with axSpA from the Reuma.pt registry who initiated their first bDMARD and attended baseline, 3-month (3 M), and 6-month (6 M) visits were included. Availability of ASDAS at baseline was cross-tabulated with its availability in ≥1 follow-up visit. When ASDAS was absent, the use of alternative outcome measures was evaluated. Treatment response (∆ASDAS ≥1.1) at 3 M and 6 M was analyzed across four response patterns: no response, 3 M only, 6 M only, or both. Results: A total of 666 patients were included. Most had ASDAS at baseline (N = 540; 81 %), and 493 (74 %) also had ASDAS at 3 M and/or 6 M. No alternative outcome measure was predominantly used when ASDAS was absent. Among 336 patients with complete ASDAS evaluation, 58 % met ASAS continuation criteria at 3 M and 60 % at 6 M, with 86 % of response maintenance between 3 M and 6 M. Additionally, 25 % of 147 non-responders at 3 M responded at 6 M. Responders at both timepoints were more often male (65 % vs 45 %) and younger (mean age 35 vs 38 years). Conclusion: ASDAS is widely assessed in axSpA patients starting bDMARDs by Portuguese rheumatologists. Most patients respond within 3 months but waiting until 6 months to determine treatment continuation is reasonable.

Original languageEnglish
Article number152781
JournalSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Volume74
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Axial spondyloarthritis
  • Axial spondyloarthritis disease activity score
  • Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
  • Disease activity scores

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of ASDAS to evaluate disease activity and response to treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis starting the first biological drug: Are ASAS recommendations being followed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this