The transparency trope

Deconstructing English academic discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

English Academic Discourse has always presented itself as a neutral vehicle of objective fact. Through the use of clearly defined terms and straightforward syntax, and the studied avoidance of forms of overt manipulation of the reader, it claims to offer a transparent window onto some pre-existing external reality. Today, however, most linguists agree that objectivity is a linguistic construct, achieved by the systematic use of grammatical forms such as nominalizations and the passive voice which mask human agency. Similarly, it is now generally understood that even the most positivistic science texts contain a certain amount of rhetorical manoeuvring designed to convince the reader of the truth value and utility of the claims made. This paper draws upon a range of linguistic, historical and philosophical sources to question this discourse’s status as the hegemonic vehicle of knowledge in the modern world.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-19
Number of pages15
JournalDiscourse and Interaction
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

transparency
linguistics
discourse
objectivity
syntax
manipulation
science
Values
Reader
Transparency
Tropes
Academic Discourse
Human Agency
Historical Linguistics
Truth Value
Objectivity
Mask
Rhetoric
Passive Voice
Syntax

Keywords

  • English academic discourse
  • Epistemology
  • Rhetoric
  • Science
  • Transparency

Cite this

@article{4ffffda982aa4ff9bbd4241872f00521,
title = "The transparency trope: Deconstructing English academic discourse",
abstract = "English Academic Discourse has always presented itself as a neutral vehicle of objective fact. Through the use of clearly defined terms and straightforward syntax, and the studied avoidance of forms of overt manipulation of the reader, it claims to offer a transparent window onto some pre-existing external reality. Today, however, most linguists agree that objectivity is a linguistic construct, achieved by the systematic use of grammatical forms such as nominalizations and the passive voice which mask human agency. Similarly, it is now generally understood that even the most positivistic science texts contain a certain amount of rhetorical manoeuvring designed to convince the reader of the truth value and utility of the claims made. This paper draws upon a range of linguistic, historical and philosophical sources to question this discourse’s status as the hegemonic vehicle of knowledge in the modern world.",
keywords = "English academic discourse, Epistemology, Rhetoric, Science, Transparency",
author = "Karen Bennett",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147374/PT# UID/ELT/04097/2013",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2015-2-5",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "5--19",
journal = "Discourse and Interaction",
issn = "1802-9930",
publisher = "Masarykova Universita",
number = "2",

}

The transparency trope : Deconstructing English academic discourse. / Bennett, Karen.

In: Discourse and Interaction, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 5-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The transparency trope

T2 - Deconstructing English academic discourse

AU - Bennett, Karen

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147374/PT# UID/ELT/04097/2013

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - English Academic Discourse has always presented itself as a neutral vehicle of objective fact. Through the use of clearly defined terms and straightforward syntax, and the studied avoidance of forms of overt manipulation of the reader, it claims to offer a transparent window onto some pre-existing external reality. Today, however, most linguists agree that objectivity is a linguistic construct, achieved by the systematic use of grammatical forms such as nominalizations and the passive voice which mask human agency. Similarly, it is now generally understood that even the most positivistic science texts contain a certain amount of rhetorical manoeuvring designed to convince the reader of the truth value and utility of the claims made. This paper draws upon a range of linguistic, historical and philosophical sources to question this discourse’s status as the hegemonic vehicle of knowledge in the modern world.

AB - English Academic Discourse has always presented itself as a neutral vehicle of objective fact. Through the use of clearly defined terms and straightforward syntax, and the studied avoidance of forms of overt manipulation of the reader, it claims to offer a transparent window onto some pre-existing external reality. Today, however, most linguists agree that objectivity is a linguistic construct, achieved by the systematic use of grammatical forms such as nominalizations and the passive voice which mask human agency. Similarly, it is now generally understood that even the most positivistic science texts contain a certain amount of rhetorical manoeuvring designed to convince the reader of the truth value and utility of the claims made. This paper draws upon a range of linguistic, historical and philosophical sources to question this discourse’s status as the hegemonic vehicle of knowledge in the modern world.

KW - English academic discourse

KW - Epistemology

KW - Rhetoric

KW - Science

KW - Transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974717549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2015-2-5

DO - https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2015-2-5

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 5

EP - 19

JO - Discourse and Interaction

JF - Discourse and Interaction

SN - 1802-9930

IS - 2

ER -