@inproceedings{19c714c560514336806729cb476fdf0d,
title = "The strategies of misattribution of commitments",
abstract = "This chapter investigates the structure and the strategies of the straw man fallacy. A straw man fallacy consists in the speaker{\textquoteright}s attacking a distorted version of the other{\textquoteright}s viewpoint or commitments, in order to rebut his argument more easily by attacking a position that has been simplified and weakened. This strategy, however, can lead to the risk of being accused of breaching the rules of the discussion by distorting the other{\textquoteright}s ideas. This risk can be avoided by relying on other tactics (such as an appeal to emotions), by distorting specific types of content, and by communicating the distortion in specific ways. The goals of this chapter are to distinguish between these distinctive types of manipulation of the hearer{\textquoteright}s commitments, and to point out the differences between implicit and explicit distortions of contents explicitly or implicitly conveyed. The various strategies are described and their dialectical effects brought to light.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Emotions, Fallacies, Implicatures, Interpretation, Pragmatics, Presuppositions, Straw man",
author = "Fabrizio Macagno and Douglas Walton",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 IF/00945/2013/CP1166/CT0003 PTDC/IVC-HFC/1817/2014 PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014; 1st International Conference in Pragmatics and Philosophy, 2016 ; Conference date: 16-05-2016 Through 16-05-2016",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4_4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319625447",
series = "Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "109--141",
booktitle = "Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation -",
address = "Netherlands",
}