TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions
AU - Jaklič, Jurij
AU - Grublješič, Tanja
AU - Popovič, Aleš
N1 - Jaklič, J., Grublješič, T., & Popovič, A. (2018). The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions. International Journal Of Information Management, 43, 305-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.017 ---%ABS2%
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Research shows that data-driven decision-making using Business Intelligence and Analytics (BI&A) can create competitive advantages for organizations. However, this can only happen if users successfully accept BI&A and use it effectively. Analytical decision processes are often characterized by non-routine and ill-structured tasks and decisions, making individuals’ work styles more pronounced. Aligning on one hand what a BI&A solution can offer and, on the other, the changing needs and expectations of users, the way they like to work – their work style, can thus be difficult. This illustrates the importance of compatibility evaluations in the BI&A context, including perceptions of the technology fit with the user's work needs and style, along with the fit with the organizational decision processes and organizational values when deciding to use BI&A. These issues have not yet been thoroughly researched in the existing BI&A literature. In response, we conduct a quantitative survey-based study to examine the interrelated role of compatibility in predicting BI&A use intentions. The model is empirically tested with the partial least squares (PLS) approach through to structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results show that compatibility perceptions have a direct positive impact on use intentions, mediate the impact of performance perceptions on use intentions, while the socio-organizational considerations of result demonstrability and social influence have interaction effects by positively strengthening the perceived relevance of compatibility in impacting use intentions.
AB - Research shows that data-driven decision-making using Business Intelligence and Analytics (BI&A) can create competitive advantages for organizations. However, this can only happen if users successfully accept BI&A and use it effectively. Analytical decision processes are often characterized by non-routine and ill-structured tasks and decisions, making individuals’ work styles more pronounced. Aligning on one hand what a BI&A solution can offer and, on the other, the changing needs and expectations of users, the way they like to work – their work style, can thus be difficult. This illustrates the importance of compatibility evaluations in the BI&A context, including perceptions of the technology fit with the user's work needs and style, along with the fit with the organizational decision processes and organizational values when deciding to use BI&A. These issues have not yet been thoroughly researched in the existing BI&A literature. In response, we conduct a quantitative survey-based study to examine the interrelated role of compatibility in predicting BI&A use intentions. The model is empirically tested with the partial least squares (PLS) approach through to structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results show that compatibility perceptions have a direct positive impact on use intentions, mediate the impact of performance perceptions on use intentions, while the socio-organizational considerations of result demonstrability and social influence have interaction effects by positively strengthening the perceived relevance of compatibility in impacting use intentions.
KW - Business intelligence & analytics
KW - Compatibility
KW - Result demonstrability
KW - Social influence
KW - Socio-organizational drivers
KW - Task-technology fit
KW - Use intentions
KW - Work style
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053084190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&UT=WOS:000447963300025
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053084190
SN - 0268-4012
VL - 43
SP - 305
EP - 318
JO - International Journal Of Information Management
JF - International Journal Of Information Management
ER -