The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor vs. the ion exchange membrane bioreactor for the removal of toxic anions from drinking water supplies: advantages and limitations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two membrane bioreactor configurations, the pressure-driven membrane bioreactor and the ion exchange membrane bioreactor (IEMB), were tested for the removal of toxic oxyanions from drinking water. The results based on a case study - nitrate removal at a treated water production rate of 30 L m-2 h-1 - showed that in both bioreactors the desired water quality in terms of nitrate and nitrite can be achieved. The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor allows for possibly higher water production rates and uses relatively cheaper membranes, however, the water quality control in terms of TOC requires on-line monitoring and a strict regulation of the carbon source addition. This configuration also requires an initial start-up period before achieving a steady state operation because the water and microbial culture are in direct contact. The ion exchange membrane bioreactor offers the advantage of selectively removing the target anion and producing TOC-free water with practically no initial start-up period. Due to the physical separation of the microbial culture from the water stream, the very low diffusion coefficient of ethanol through the Neosepta ACS membrane used, and the membrane-attached biofilm acting as an additional reactive barrier to ethanol penetration, secondary pollution of the treated water was avoided. The development of cheaper anion exchange membrane (possibly in a hollow fibre form) would make the IEMB process economically competitive.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-58
Number of pages5
JournalFiltration
Volume7
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Ion exchange membranes
Bioreactors
Water supply
Potable water
Negative ions
Membranes
Water
Water quality
Nitrates
Ethanol
Biofilms
Quality control
Ion exchange
Pollution
Carbon
Fibers
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Dyalisis
  • Membranes
  • Dialysis DD

Cite this

@article{bb334a5ef42c4d24a7ba984c1d0e5674,
title = "The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor vs. the ion exchange membrane bioreactor for the removal of toxic anions from drinking water supplies: advantages and limitations",
abstract = "Two membrane bioreactor configurations, the pressure-driven membrane bioreactor and the ion exchange membrane bioreactor (IEMB), were tested for the removal of toxic oxyanions from drinking water. The results based on a case study - nitrate removal at a treated water production rate of 30 L m-2 h-1 - showed that in both bioreactors the desired water quality in terms of nitrate and nitrite can be achieved. The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor allows for possibly higher water production rates and uses relatively cheaper membranes, however, the water quality control in terms of TOC requires on-line monitoring and a strict regulation of the carbon source addition. This configuration also requires an initial start-up period before achieving a steady state operation because the water and microbial culture are in direct contact. The ion exchange membrane bioreactor offers the advantage of selectively removing the target anion and producing TOC-free water with practically no initial start-up period. Due to the physical separation of the microbial culture from the water stream, the very low diffusion coefficient of ethanol through the Neosepta ACS membrane used, and the membrane-attached biofilm acting as an additional reactive barrier to ethanol penetration, secondary pollution of the treated water was avoided. The development of cheaper anion exchange membrane (possibly in a hollow fibre form) would make the IEMB process economically competitive.",
keywords = "Dyalisis, Membranes, Dialysis DD",
author = "Svetlozar Velizarov and Ana Barreiros and Matos, {Cristina T.} and Reis, {Maria A.} and Crespo, {Jo{\~a}o G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "54--58",
journal = "Filtration",
issn = "1479-0602",
publisher = "Filtration Solutions",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor vs. the ion exchange membrane bioreactor for the removal of toxic anions from drinking water supplies: advantages and limitations

AU - Velizarov, Svetlozar

AU - Barreiros, Ana

AU - Matos, Cristina T.

AU - Reis, Maria A.

AU - Crespo, João G.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Two membrane bioreactor configurations, the pressure-driven membrane bioreactor and the ion exchange membrane bioreactor (IEMB), were tested for the removal of toxic oxyanions from drinking water. The results based on a case study - nitrate removal at a treated water production rate of 30 L m-2 h-1 - showed that in both bioreactors the desired water quality in terms of nitrate and nitrite can be achieved. The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor allows for possibly higher water production rates and uses relatively cheaper membranes, however, the water quality control in terms of TOC requires on-line monitoring and a strict regulation of the carbon source addition. This configuration also requires an initial start-up period before achieving a steady state operation because the water and microbial culture are in direct contact. The ion exchange membrane bioreactor offers the advantage of selectively removing the target anion and producing TOC-free water with practically no initial start-up period. Due to the physical separation of the microbial culture from the water stream, the very low diffusion coefficient of ethanol through the Neosepta ACS membrane used, and the membrane-attached biofilm acting as an additional reactive barrier to ethanol penetration, secondary pollution of the treated water was avoided. The development of cheaper anion exchange membrane (possibly in a hollow fibre form) would make the IEMB process economically competitive.

AB - Two membrane bioreactor configurations, the pressure-driven membrane bioreactor and the ion exchange membrane bioreactor (IEMB), were tested for the removal of toxic oxyanions from drinking water. The results based on a case study - nitrate removal at a treated water production rate of 30 L m-2 h-1 - showed that in both bioreactors the desired water quality in terms of nitrate and nitrite can be achieved. The pressure-driven membrane bioreactor allows for possibly higher water production rates and uses relatively cheaper membranes, however, the water quality control in terms of TOC requires on-line monitoring and a strict regulation of the carbon source addition. This configuration also requires an initial start-up period before achieving a steady state operation because the water and microbial culture are in direct contact. The ion exchange membrane bioreactor offers the advantage of selectively removing the target anion and producing TOC-free water with practically no initial start-up period. Due to the physical separation of the microbial culture from the water stream, the very low diffusion coefficient of ethanol through the Neosepta ACS membrane used, and the membrane-attached biofilm acting as an additional reactive barrier to ethanol penetration, secondary pollution of the treated water was avoided. The development of cheaper anion exchange membrane (possibly in a hollow fibre form) would make the IEMB process economically competitive.

KW - Dyalisis

KW - Membranes

KW - Dialysis DD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846294736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 54

EP - 58

JO - Filtration

JF - Filtration

SN - 1479-0602

IS - 1

ER -