The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has recently been a conscious push for cities in Europe to be smarter and more sustainable, leading to the need to benchmark these cities’ efforts using robust assessment frameworks. This paper ranks 28 European capital cities based on how smart and sustainable they are. Using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), we synthesized 32 indicators into 4 components and computed rank scores. The ranking of European capital cities was based on this rank score. Our results show that Berlin and other Nordic capital cities lead the ranking, while Sofia and Bucharest obtained the lowest rank scores, and are thus not yet on the path of being smart and sustainable. While our city rank scores show little correlation with city size and city population, there is a significant positive correlation with the cities’ GDP per inhabitant, which is an indicator for wealth. Lastly, we detect a geographical divide: 12 of the top 14 cities are Western European; 11 of the bottom 14 cities are Eastern European. These results will help cities understand where they stand vis-à-vis other cities, giving policy makers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.

LanguageEnglish
Pages475-487
Number of pages13
JournalSustainable Cities and Society
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Principal component analysis
ranking
capital city
Berlin
inhabitant
Europe
city
Gross Domestic Product
principal component analysis

Keywords

  • European cities
  • Hierarchical clustering
  • Principal component analysis
  • Smart cities
  • Sustainable cities

Cite this

@article{d2491b48177b4ba0a29b0cf4a8ec0c90,
title = "The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe",
abstract = "There has recently been a conscious push for cities in Europe to be smarter and more sustainable, leading to the need to benchmark these cities’ efforts using robust assessment frameworks. This paper ranks 28 European capital cities based on how smart and sustainable they are. Using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), we synthesized 32 indicators into 4 components and computed rank scores. The ranking of European capital cities was based on this rank score. Our results show that Berlin and other Nordic capital cities lead the ranking, while Sofia and Bucharest obtained the lowest rank scores, and are thus not yet on the path of being smart and sustainable. While our city rank scores show little correlation with city size and city population, there is a significant positive correlation with the cities’ GDP per inhabitant, which is an indicator for wealth. Lastly, we detect a geographical divide: 12 of the top 14 cities are Western European; 11 of the bottom 14 cities are Eastern European. These results will help cities understand where they stand vis-{\`a}-vis other cities, giving policy makers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.",
keywords = "European cities, Hierarchical clustering, Principal component analysis, Smart cities, Sustainable cities",
author = "Adeoluwa Akande and Pedro Cabral and Paulo Gomes and Sven Casteleyn",
note = "Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 475-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "475--487",
journal = "Sustainable Cities and Society",
issn = "2210-6707",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. / Akande, Adeoluwa; Cabral, Pedro; Gomes, Paulo; Casteleyn, Sven.

In: Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 44, 01.01.2019, p. 475-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe

AU - Akande, Adeoluwa

AU - Cabral, Pedro

AU - Gomes, Paulo

AU - Casteleyn, Sven

N1 - Akande, A., Cabral, P., Gomes, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 475-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - There has recently been a conscious push for cities in Europe to be smarter and more sustainable, leading to the need to benchmark these cities’ efforts using robust assessment frameworks. This paper ranks 28 European capital cities based on how smart and sustainable they are. Using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), we synthesized 32 indicators into 4 components and computed rank scores. The ranking of European capital cities was based on this rank score. Our results show that Berlin and other Nordic capital cities lead the ranking, while Sofia and Bucharest obtained the lowest rank scores, and are thus not yet on the path of being smart and sustainable. While our city rank scores show little correlation with city size and city population, there is a significant positive correlation with the cities’ GDP per inhabitant, which is an indicator for wealth. Lastly, we detect a geographical divide: 12 of the top 14 cities are Western European; 11 of the bottom 14 cities are Eastern European. These results will help cities understand where they stand vis-à-vis other cities, giving policy makers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.

AB - There has recently been a conscious push for cities in Europe to be smarter and more sustainable, leading to the need to benchmark these cities’ efforts using robust assessment frameworks. This paper ranks 28 European capital cities based on how smart and sustainable they are. Using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), we synthesized 32 indicators into 4 components and computed rank scores. The ranking of European capital cities was based on this rank score. Our results show that Berlin and other Nordic capital cities lead the ranking, while Sofia and Bucharest obtained the lowest rank scores, and are thus not yet on the path of being smart and sustainable. While our city rank scores show little correlation with city size and city population, there is a significant positive correlation with the cities’ GDP per inhabitant, which is an indicator for wealth. Lastly, we detect a geographical divide: 12 of the top 14 cities are Western European; 11 of the bottom 14 cities are Eastern European. These results will help cities understand where they stand vis-à-vis other cities, giving policy makers an opportunity to identify areas for improvement while leveraging areas of strength.

KW - European cities

KW - Hierarchical clustering

KW - Principal component analysis

KW - Smart cities

KW - Sustainable cities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055888021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=Alerting&SrcApp=Alerting&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&UT=WOS:000451754200039

U2 - 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 475

EP - 487

JO - Sustainable Cities and Society

T2 - Sustainable Cities and Society

JF - Sustainable Cities and Society

SN - 2210-6707

ER -