TY - JOUR
T1 - The Legal Nature of New Generation Free Trade Agreements
T2 - Lessons from the CETA Saga
AU - Pereira Coutinho, Francisco
N1 - ISSN: 2184-3902
Publisher: Centro de Investigação em Ciência Política
University of Minho
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is a “new generation” bilateral “mixed” free trade agreement signed on 30 October 2016 between Canada and the European Union alongside its Member States. In the European Union, “mixed” trade agreements follow an adoption procedure that determines, in the best-case scenario, a substantial delay to their entry into force, and, in the worst, a veto by Member States that damages the international standing of the European Union. The European Com-mission bowed to Member States’ pressure and decided to qualify CETA as a “mixed agreement” instead of an “EU-only agreement”. That the “guardian of the Treaties” had no constitutional leeway on the choice of CETA’s approval form became clear after the decision of the Court of Justice on the free trade agreement nego¬tiated between the European Union and Singapore (Opinion 2/15). CETA’s “mixed” nature determines that its application is
AB - The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) is a “new generation” bilateral “mixed” free trade agreement signed on 30 October 2016 between Canada and the European Union alongside its Member States. In the European Union, “mixed” trade agreements follow an adoption procedure that determines, in the best-case scenario, a substantial delay to their entry into force, and, in the worst, a veto by Member States that damages the international standing of the European Union. The European Com-mission bowed to Member States’ pressure and decided to qualify CETA as a “mixed agreement” instead of an “EU-only agreement”. That the “guardian of the Treaties” had no constitutional leeway on the choice of CETA’s approval form became clear after the decision of the Court of Justice on the free trade agreement nego¬tiated between the European Union and Singapore (Opinion 2/15). CETA’s “mixed” nature determines that its application is
KW - Canada
KW - CETA
KW - Court of Justice
KW - European Union (EU)
KW - Mixed Agreements
U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565
DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.4565
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 77
EP - 92
JO - Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science
JF - Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science
M1 - 6
ER -