The Good and the Bad Concentration

Regedorias in Angola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rural divisions and population arrangements in colonial settings are today as prone to confusion and subjective representations as they once were. In this paper, we focus on the Angolan late colonial experience of villagization and population resettlement and ask if there is a clear distinction between proto-urban settings in rural areas and colonial penal camps. We argue that the history of colonial prisons and (model) villages must consider the strategies of distinction put at work by local and metropolitan authorities. Among these distinctions, the architectural and aesthetical features of village projects became part of a conflict, opposing at once colonial civil administrators and metropolitan actors, on one side, and military officers, on the other. Together, the administrative and the military rationales for top-down social engineering projects make up the core of an important, yet overlooked debate on what constituted the good and the bad types of African concentration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-231
Number of pages27
JournalPortuguese Studies Review
Volume25
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Angola
Prisons
Rural Population
Administrative Personnel
History
Population

Cite this

@article{71ffef484e76494dab7928cd49e09131,
title = "The Good and the Bad Concentration: Regedorias in Angola",
abstract = "Rural divisions and population arrangements in colonial settings are today as prone to confusion and subjective representations as they once were. In this paper, we focus on the Angolan late colonial experience of villagization and population resettlement and ask if there is a clear distinction between proto-urban settings in rural areas and colonial penal camps. We argue that the history of colonial prisons and (model) villages must consider the strategies of distinction put at work by local and metropolitan authorities. Among these distinctions, the architectural and aesthetical features of village projects became part of a conflict, opposing at once colonial civil administrators and metropolitan actors, on one side, and military officers, on the other. Together, the administrative and the military rationales for top-down social engineering projects make up the core of an important, yet overlooked debate on what constituted the good and the bad types of African concentration.",
author = "Curto, {Diogo Ramada} and Bernardo Cruz",
note = "Financiamento: UID/CPO/04627/2013 e PD/BD/106069/2015.",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "205--231",
journal = "Portuguese Studies Review",
issn = "1057-1515",
publisher = "International Conference Group on Portugal",
number = "1",

}

The Good and the Bad Concentration : Regedorias in Angola. / Curto, Diogo Ramada; Cruz, Bernardo .

In: Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2017, p. 205-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Good and the Bad Concentration

T2 - Regedorias in Angola

AU - Curto, Diogo Ramada

AU - Cruz, Bernardo

N1 - Financiamento: UID/CPO/04627/2013 e PD/BD/106069/2015.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Rural divisions and population arrangements in colonial settings are today as prone to confusion and subjective representations as they once were. In this paper, we focus on the Angolan late colonial experience of villagization and population resettlement and ask if there is a clear distinction between proto-urban settings in rural areas and colonial penal camps. We argue that the history of colonial prisons and (model) villages must consider the strategies of distinction put at work by local and metropolitan authorities. Among these distinctions, the architectural and aesthetical features of village projects became part of a conflict, opposing at once colonial civil administrators and metropolitan actors, on one side, and military officers, on the other. Together, the administrative and the military rationales for top-down social engineering projects make up the core of an important, yet overlooked debate on what constituted the good and the bad types of African concentration.

AB - Rural divisions and population arrangements in colonial settings are today as prone to confusion and subjective representations as they once were. In this paper, we focus on the Angolan late colonial experience of villagization and population resettlement and ask if there is a clear distinction between proto-urban settings in rural areas and colonial penal camps. We argue that the history of colonial prisons and (model) villages must consider the strategies of distinction put at work by local and metropolitan authorities. Among these distinctions, the architectural and aesthetical features of village projects became part of a conflict, opposing at once colonial civil administrators and metropolitan actors, on one side, and military officers, on the other. Together, the administrative and the military rationales for top-down social engineering projects make up the core of an important, yet overlooked debate on what constituted the good and the bad types of African concentration.

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 205

EP - 231

JO - Portuguese Studies Review

JF - Portuguese Studies Review

SN - 1057-1515

IS - 1

ER -