The foundations of a critical social theory

Lessons from the Positivismusstreit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is the Positivismusstreit still worth our time? Fifty years after a controversy that contemporary observers have already marked as rather disappointing, the contemporary scholar might have a hard time trying to make sense of a debate that raised attention for its political implications more than for its contribution to social theory. And yet, some very important lessons can still be drawn from it. First, the ethical foundations of science – including social science –, inasmuch as any scientific enterprise, rest on an ethical ideal of knowledge and society; second, the fact that such a foundation is itself not subject to scientific ‘proof’, but must be instead argued for (or against) on the basis of a critical reflection on the historical traditions and the social practices that make science possible. The article aims to highlight that these assumptions are present both in Popper’s and in Adorno’s approach to science, how they have been further elaborated by Habermas in a close engagement with the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics and what is their importance for today’s scholar.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-184
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Classical Sociology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2015

Fingerprint

science
hermeneutics
social science
time
Society

Keywords

  • Adorno
  • Critical theory
  • Frankfurt School
  • Popper
  • Positivismusstreit

Cite this

@article{691f1ff70e644dad86cb3c4e51729e97,
title = "The foundations of a critical social theory: Lessons from the Positivismusstreit",
abstract = "Is the Positivismusstreit still worth our time? Fifty years after a controversy that contemporary observers have already marked as rather disappointing, the contemporary scholar might have a hard time trying to make sense of a debate that raised attention for its political implications more than for its contribution to social theory. And yet, some very important lessons can still be drawn from it. First, the ethical foundations of science – including social science –, inasmuch as any scientific enterprise, rest on an ethical ideal of knowledge and society; second, the fact that such a foundation is itself not subject to scientific ‘proof’, but must be instead argued for (or against) on the basis of a critical reflection on the historical traditions and the social practices that make science possible. The article aims to highlight that these assumptions are present both in Popper’s and in Adorno’s approach to science, how they have been further elaborated by Habermas in a close engagement with the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics and what is their importance for today’s scholar.",
keywords = "Adorno, Critical theory, Frankfurt School, Popper, Positivismusstreit",
author = "{De Angelis}, Gabriele",
note = "WOS:000355837000007",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1177/1468795X14567286",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "170--184",
journal = "Journal of Classical Sociology",
issn = "1468-795X",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "2",

}

The foundations of a critical social theory : Lessons from the Positivismusstreit. / De Angelis, Gabriele.

In: Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 08.05.2015, p. 170-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The foundations of a critical social theory

T2 - Lessons from the Positivismusstreit

AU - De Angelis, Gabriele

N1 - WOS:000355837000007

PY - 2015/5/8

Y1 - 2015/5/8

N2 - Is the Positivismusstreit still worth our time? Fifty years after a controversy that contemporary observers have already marked as rather disappointing, the contemporary scholar might have a hard time trying to make sense of a debate that raised attention for its political implications more than for its contribution to social theory. And yet, some very important lessons can still be drawn from it. First, the ethical foundations of science – including social science –, inasmuch as any scientific enterprise, rest on an ethical ideal of knowledge and society; second, the fact that such a foundation is itself not subject to scientific ‘proof’, but must be instead argued for (or against) on the basis of a critical reflection on the historical traditions and the social practices that make science possible. The article aims to highlight that these assumptions are present both in Popper’s and in Adorno’s approach to science, how they have been further elaborated by Habermas in a close engagement with the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics and what is their importance for today’s scholar.

AB - Is the Positivismusstreit still worth our time? Fifty years after a controversy that contemporary observers have already marked as rather disappointing, the contemporary scholar might have a hard time trying to make sense of a debate that raised attention for its political implications more than for its contribution to social theory. And yet, some very important lessons can still be drawn from it. First, the ethical foundations of science – including social science –, inasmuch as any scientific enterprise, rest on an ethical ideal of knowledge and society; second, the fact that such a foundation is itself not subject to scientific ‘proof’, but must be instead argued for (or against) on the basis of a critical reflection on the historical traditions and the social practices that make science possible. The article aims to highlight that these assumptions are present both in Popper’s and in Adorno’s approach to science, how they have been further elaborated by Habermas in a close engagement with the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics and what is their importance for today’s scholar.

KW - Adorno

KW - Critical theory

KW - Frankfurt School

KW - Popper

KW - Positivismusstreit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930587269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468795X14567286

DO - 10.1177/1468795X14567286

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 170

EP - 184

JO - Journal of Classical Sociology

JF - Journal of Classical Sociology

SN - 1468-795X

IS - 2

ER -