The ethical convenience of non-neutrality in medical encounters

Argumentative instruments for healthcare providers

Daniela Leone, Sarah Bigi, Maria Grazia Rossi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many scholars have shown the relevance of communication as an instrument of care by arguing that the quality of the doctor-patient relationship -Also based on the quality of verbal communication -Affects the engagement and outcomes of patients. This understanding of such therapeutic role of communication paves the way to a re-consideration of ethical questions in clinical contexts: if communication is a therapeutic instrument, then healthcare providers need to be able to properly use it. Our main aim in this contribution is to argue that it is possible and desirable to adopt and manage non-neutral communication strategies to safeguard patients' freedom and autonomy in making decisions. More specifically, we use a pragmatic-Argumentative model of verbal communication to deal with the topic of neutrality. Analyzing a case study from the context of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), we underline the highly ethical relevance of this medical context and stress the importance of an appropriate use of argumentative and communicative strategies to protect patients' values and decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-157
Number of pages19
JournalTeoria
Volume37
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Communication
Healthcare
Therapeutics
Verbal Communication
Autonomy
Doctor-patient Relationship
Neutrality
Communicative Strategies
Reproductive Technology
Communication Strategies
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Assisted reproductive technology
  • Dialogical relevance
  • Doctor-patient communication
  • Non-neutral communication
  • Patient-centered medicine

Cite this

@article{ec0ab439eb7b414e8e96574ecd58001b,
title = "The ethical convenience of non-neutrality in medical encounters: Argumentative instruments for healthcare providers",
abstract = "Many scholars have shown the relevance of communication as an instrument of care by arguing that the quality of the doctor-patient relationship -Also based on the quality of verbal communication -Affects the engagement and outcomes of patients. This understanding of such therapeutic role of communication paves the way to a re-consideration of ethical questions in clinical contexts: if communication is a therapeutic instrument, then healthcare providers need to be able to properly use it. Our main aim in this contribution is to argue that it is possible and desirable to adopt and manage non-neutral communication strategies to safeguard patients' freedom and autonomy in making decisions. More specifically, we use a pragmatic-Argumentative model of verbal communication to deal with the topic of neutrality. Analyzing a case study from the context of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), we underline the highly ethical relevance of this medical context and stress the importance of an appropriate use of argumentative and communicative strategies to protect patients' values and decisions.",
keywords = "Assisted reproductive technology, Dialogical relevance, Doctor-patient communication, Non-neutral communication, Patient-centered medicine",
author = "Daniela Leone and Sarah Bigi and Rossi, {Maria Grazia}",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 SFRH/BPD/115073/2016",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "139--157",
journal = "Teoria",
issn = "1122-1259",
publisher = "Dipartimento di Filosofia dell Universita di Pisa",
number = "2",

}

The ethical convenience of non-neutrality in medical encounters : Argumentative instruments for healthcare providers. / Leone, Daniela; Bigi, Sarah; Rossi, Maria Grazia.

In: Teoria, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2017, p. 139-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethical convenience of non-neutrality in medical encounters

T2 - Argumentative instruments for healthcare providers

AU - Leone, Daniela

AU - Bigi, Sarah

AU - Rossi, Maria Grazia

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 SFRH/BPD/115073/2016

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Many scholars have shown the relevance of communication as an instrument of care by arguing that the quality of the doctor-patient relationship -Also based on the quality of verbal communication -Affects the engagement and outcomes of patients. This understanding of such therapeutic role of communication paves the way to a re-consideration of ethical questions in clinical contexts: if communication is a therapeutic instrument, then healthcare providers need to be able to properly use it. Our main aim in this contribution is to argue that it is possible and desirable to adopt and manage non-neutral communication strategies to safeguard patients' freedom and autonomy in making decisions. More specifically, we use a pragmatic-Argumentative model of verbal communication to deal with the topic of neutrality. Analyzing a case study from the context of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), we underline the highly ethical relevance of this medical context and stress the importance of an appropriate use of argumentative and communicative strategies to protect patients' values and decisions.

AB - Many scholars have shown the relevance of communication as an instrument of care by arguing that the quality of the doctor-patient relationship -Also based on the quality of verbal communication -Affects the engagement and outcomes of patients. This understanding of such therapeutic role of communication paves the way to a re-consideration of ethical questions in clinical contexts: if communication is a therapeutic instrument, then healthcare providers need to be able to properly use it. Our main aim in this contribution is to argue that it is possible and desirable to adopt and manage non-neutral communication strategies to safeguard patients' freedom and autonomy in making decisions. More specifically, we use a pragmatic-Argumentative model of verbal communication to deal with the topic of neutrality. Analyzing a case study from the context of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), we underline the highly ethical relevance of this medical context and stress the importance of an appropriate use of argumentative and communicative strategies to protect patients' values and decisions.

KW - Assisted reproductive technology

KW - Dialogical relevance

KW - Doctor-patient communication

KW - Non-neutral communication

KW - Patient-centered medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038640062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 139

EP - 157

JO - Teoria

JF - Teoria

SN - 1122-1259

IS - 2

ER -