TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of substrate competition on the metabolism of polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs)
AU - Carvalheira, Mónica
AU - Oehmen, Adrian
AU - Carvalho, Gilda
AU - Reis, Maria A. M.
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F88382%2F2012/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/120581/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/COMPETE/132972/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/103147/PT#
PhD grant SFRH/BD65113/2009.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - The type of carbon source present in the wastewater is one factor that affects the competition between polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) and glycogen accumulating organisms (GAO) and therefore, the efficiency of the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process. This study investigated the impact of the carbon source composition on the anaerobic and aerobic kinetics of PAOs and the EBPR performance of an 85% PAO enrichment. When both acetate (HAc) and propionate (HPr) were present, propionate was depleted more quickly, with a constant uptake rate of 0.18±0.02C-mol/(C-mol biomass·h), while the acetate uptake rate decreased with an increase in propionate concentration, due to the substrate competition between acetate and propionate. The metabolic model for PAOs was modified to incorporate the anaerobic substrate competition effect. The aerobic rates for phosphorus (P) uptake, glycogen production and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) degradation were within the same range for all tests, indicating that these rates are essentially independent of the acetate and propionate concentration, simplifying the calibration procedure for metabolic models. The metabolic model applied to describe the anaerobic and aerobic activity agreed well with the experimental data of HAc, HPr, P, PHA and biomass growth. The low glycogen consumption observed suggest that some reducing equivalents were generated anaerobically through the TCA cycle. The results of this work suggest that the propionate uptake kinetics by PAOs can provide them an advantage over GAOs in EBPR systems, even when the propionate fraction of the influent is relatively low.
AB - The type of carbon source present in the wastewater is one factor that affects the competition between polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) and glycogen accumulating organisms (GAO) and therefore, the efficiency of the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process. This study investigated the impact of the carbon source composition on the anaerobic and aerobic kinetics of PAOs and the EBPR performance of an 85% PAO enrichment. When both acetate (HAc) and propionate (HPr) were present, propionate was depleted more quickly, with a constant uptake rate of 0.18±0.02C-mol/(C-mol biomass·h), while the acetate uptake rate decreased with an increase in propionate concentration, due to the substrate competition between acetate and propionate. The metabolic model for PAOs was modified to incorporate the anaerobic substrate competition effect. The aerobic rates for phosphorus (P) uptake, glycogen production and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) degradation were within the same range for all tests, indicating that these rates are essentially independent of the acetate and propionate concentration, simplifying the calibration procedure for metabolic models. The metabolic model applied to describe the anaerobic and aerobic activity agreed well with the experimental data of HAc, HPr, P, PHA and biomass growth. The low glycogen consumption observed suggest that some reducing equivalents were generated anaerobically through the TCA cycle. The results of this work suggest that the propionate uptake kinetics by PAOs can provide them an advantage over GAOs in EBPR systems, even when the propionate fraction of the influent is relatively low.
KW - Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR)
KW - Glycogen accumulating organisms (GAO)
KW - Metabolic model
KW - Polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO)
KW - Substrate competition
KW - Volatile fatty acids (VFAs)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904459498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 25051162
AN - SCOPUS:84904459498
SN - 0043-1354
VL - 64
SP - 149
EP - 159
JO - Water Research
JF - Water Research
ER -