The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises: Presumptions in Enthymemes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)


The implicit dimension of enthymemes is investigated from a pragmatic perspective to show why a premise can be left unexpressed, and how it can be used strategically. The relationship between the implicit act of taking for granted and the pattern of presumptive reasoning is shown to be the cornerstone of kairos and the fallacy of straw man. By taking a proposition for granted, the speaker shifts the burden of proving its un-acceptability onto the hearer. The resemblance (likeliness) of the tacit premise with what is commonly acceptable or has been actually stated can be used as a rhetorical strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-393
Number of pages29
JournalInformal Logic
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2013


  • Enthymeme
  • Argumentation
  • Missing premises
  • Kairos
  • Presumptions
  • Burden of proof
  • Straw man


Dive into the research topics of 'The Dialogical Force of Implicit Premises: Presumptions in Enthymemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this