TY - JOUR
T1 - The Aura of Opera Reproduced
T2 - Phantasies and Traps in the Age of the Cinecast
AU - Cachopo, João Pedro
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/708601/EU#
This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 708601- PROPERA - The Profanation of Opera: Music and Drama on Film
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147237/PT#
UID/EAT/00693/2013
PY - 2019/7/23
Y1 - 2019/7/23
N2 - Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.
AB - Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084805868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=F5faKFpPxCq6de5Rchq&page=1&doc=1
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbz006
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbz006
M3 - Article
SN - 0736-0053
VL - 34
SP - 266
EP - 283
JO - Opera Quarterly
JF - Opera Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -