The Aura of Opera Reproduced: Phantasies and Traps in the Age of the Cinecast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-283
Number of pages18
JournalOpera Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Phantasy
Aura
Opera
Trap
Remediation
Paradox
Liveness
Uniqueness
Critical Reflection
Nostalgia
Blends
Excess
Fetishism
Originality
Mediatization
Broadcasting
Paradigmatics
Media Culture
Questioning
Aesthetics

Cite this

@article{269e86ff63034e00b38f84d5fb676127,
title = "The Aura of Opera Reproduced: Phantasies and Traps in the Age of the Cinecast",
abstract = "Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.",
author = "Cachopo, {Jo{\~a}o Pedro de Bastos Gon{\cc}alves}",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/708601/EU# This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 708601- PROPERA - The Profanation of Opera: Music and Drama on Film",
year = "2018",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbz006",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "266--283",
journal = "Opera Quaterly",
issn = "0736-0053",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "4",

}

The Aura of Opera Reproduced : Phantasies and Traps in the Age of the Cinecast. / Cachopo, João Pedro de Bastos Gonçalves.

In: Opera Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2018, p. 266-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Aura of Opera Reproduced

T2 - Phantasies and Traps in the Age of the Cinecast

AU - Cachopo, João Pedro de Bastos Gonçalves

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/708601/EU# This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 708601- PROPERA - The Profanation of Opera: Music and Drama on Film

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.

AB - Aiming to contribute to the debate on the relationship between opera and screen media, I begin this article with a few questions regarding the aesthetic and political implications of technological reproduction. Against this background, I examine and critique the paradox that pervades our media-saturated culture in which the remediation of musical-theatrical works is often encouraged and praised as a means of fostering, rather than of questioning, a sense of authenticity, uniqueness, and presence associated with originality. This will lead me to the analysis of three objects in which this paradox, which is bound up with a blend of nostalgia and urge for excess, finds three paradigmatic instances. Picking up on the discussion of the third of these cases, in which the phenomenon of opera cinecasts takes central stage, I close the article with a critical reflection on the challenge inherent in recording and broadcasting opera stage productions. In this context, my main goal will be to suggest ways of avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera without falling into the trap of dichotomizing mediatization and liveness.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbz006

DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/kbz006

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 266

EP - 283

JO - Opera Quaterly

JF - Opera Quaterly

SN - 0736-0053

IS - 4

ER -