TY - UNPB
T1 - Technology assessment in Non-PTA countries
T2 - an overview of recent developments in Europe
AU - Moniz, António Brandão
AU - Boavida, Nuno
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147304/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F76200%2F2011/PT# UID/SOC/04647/2013
SFRH/BD/76200/2011
PY - 2015/5
Y1 - 2015/5
N2 - This work aims to describe the latest developments in European countries or regions that lack a structure to develop Parliamentary Technology Assessment activities (named non-PTA). They are countries or regions where parliamentary-oriented technology assessment activities have not yet resulted in a formal structure, but where these activities can be detected to some extent. We will concentrate on activities in Portugal, Wallonia, and other Central and Eastern countries such as the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Lithuania and Bulgaria. Catalonia is mentioned as a specific case where a formal PTA structure exists but the way it is organized and financed is similar to the national and regional experiences at the non-PTA countries. We can conclude that TA institutionalization in non-PTA countries appears to be dependent on the level of public production of knowledge. In fact, the presence or absence of Science & Technology (S&T) issues on the public agenda of these countries and regions affects the need for parliamentary policy advice: in their presence, S&T agenda pushes the need for TA advice by parliamentarians; in their absence, the promotion of innovation tries to keep up with globalization pressures and to generate economic growth, without significant demands for TA advice.
AB - This work aims to describe the latest developments in European countries or regions that lack a structure to develop Parliamentary Technology Assessment activities (named non-PTA). They are countries or regions where parliamentary-oriented technology assessment activities have not yet resulted in a formal structure, but where these activities can be detected to some extent. We will concentrate on activities in Portugal, Wallonia, and other Central and Eastern countries such as the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Lithuania and Bulgaria. Catalonia is mentioned as a specific case where a formal PTA structure exists but the way it is organized and financed is similar to the national and regional experiences at the non-PTA countries. We can conclude that TA institutionalization in non-PTA countries appears to be dependent on the level of public production of knowledge. In fact, the presence or absence of Science & Technology (S&T) issues on the public agenda of these countries and regions affects the need for parliamentary policy advice: in their presence, S&T agenda pushes the need for TA advice by parliamentarians; in their absence, the promotion of innovation tries to keep up with globalization pressures and to generate economic growth, without significant demands for TA advice.
KW - Parliamentary Technology Assessment
KW - Europe
KW - Science & Technology
KW - Innovation
M3 - Working paper
SN - 1646-8929
VL - 07/2015
T3 - IET Working Paper Series
SP - 1
EP - 9
BT - Technology assessment in Non-PTA countries
PB - IET
CY - Monte de Caparica
ER -