Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)


For the past decade, researchers' attention to abusive supervision (Tepper, 2000, Acad. Manage. J., 43, 178) has grown consistently. However, little is still known as to why certain individuals are picked by supervisors as targets for abuse. Our study tests a model of antecedents of abusive supervision, building on the profile of submissive employees (Aquino & Lamertz, 2004, J. Appl. Psychol., 89, 1023) and examining the potential role played by the work context. With a sample of 193 employee-supervisor dyads from downsized and non-downsized organizations, we found that as core self-evaluations and coworker support decreased, abusive supervision increased, particularly in downsized organizations, and this effect carried over to both in-role and extra-role performance. Using a displaced aggression framework (Hoobler & Brass, 2006, J. Appl. Psychol., 91, 1125), our study contributes to the discussion of the antecedents of abusive supervision by emphasizing the roles played (1) by the victim and (2) by the context in which these events take place.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-534
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • Abusive supervision
  • Co-worker support
  • Core self-evaluations
  • Downsizing
  • Performance
  • Submissive employees


Dive into the research topics of 'Taking it out on survivors: Submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this