Surface vs. groundwater

the effect of forest cover on the costs of drinking water

Ana Faria Lopes, Jacob L. Macdonald, Paula Quinteiro, Luís Arroja, Cláudia Carvalho-Santos, Maria A. Cunha-e-Sá, Ana Cláudia Dias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forests worldwide provide a variety of ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, soil protection and water purification. In particular, the minimal use of pesticides and fertilizers in forest operations coupled with the tree root system are associated with higher drinking water quality. However, forest coverage is expected to have a more influential impact in groundwater quality rather than surface as well as, consequently, on drinking water treatment costs. This study uses cross sectional data at firm level to assess the marginal effect of forest cover on drinking water treatment costs for the case of Portugal, the first of its kind for the country. Our analysis makes use of a range of GIS and spatial variables which capture the heterogeneity in local forest coverage. The results obtained suggest the existence of a positive and significant effect of local forest cover on water treatment cost savings of 0.056%. However, this effect applies to firms extracting water from groundwater intakes. Neighboring measures of forest coverage have a greater impact on costs from surface water firms. The crucial role of local forest coverage through groundwater provision relates to a problem of intertemporal variation of those costs. Given the expected impact of climate change on precipitation in some regions where drinking water is mostly supplied by groundwater intakes, and since around 97% of forest land is privately owned, these results may suggest that appropriate incentives (e.g., payments for ecosystem services) could contribute to ensuring the sustainable use of water and forest resources.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100123
JournalWater Resources and Economics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

forest cover
drinking water
water
groundwater
costs
cost
coverage
ecosystem service
firm
forest resource
effect
root system
carbon sequestration
savings
incentive
water treatment
pesticide
GIS
water resource
fertilizer

Keywords

  • Forest coverage
  • Water purification
  • Water treatment costs

Cite this

@article{cf6ccbf1ee7a4aa09a685e5cb6cf5015,
title = "Surface vs. groundwater: the effect of forest cover on the costs of drinking water",
abstract = "Forests worldwide provide a variety of ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, soil protection and water purification. In particular, the minimal use of pesticides and fertilizers in forest operations coupled with the tree root system are associated with higher drinking water quality. However, forest coverage is expected to have a more influential impact in groundwater quality rather than surface as well as, consequently, on drinking water treatment costs. This study uses cross sectional data at firm level to assess the marginal effect of forest cover on drinking water treatment costs for the case of Portugal, the first of its kind for the country. Our analysis makes use of a range of GIS and spatial variables which capture the heterogeneity in local forest coverage. The results obtained suggest the existence of a positive and significant effect of local forest cover on water treatment cost savings of 0.056{\%}. However, this effect applies to firms extracting water from groundwater intakes. Neighboring measures of forest coverage have a greater impact on costs from surface water firms. The crucial role of local forest coverage through groundwater provision relates to a problem of intertemporal variation of those costs. Given the expected impact of climate change on precipitation in some regions where drinking water is mostly supplied by groundwater intakes, and since around 97{\%} of forest land is privately owned, these results may suggest that appropriate incentives (e.g., payments for ecosystem services) could contribute to ensuring the sustainable use of water and forest resources.",
keywords = "Forest coverage, Water purification, Water treatment costs",
author = "Lopes, {Ana Faria} and Macdonald, {Jacob L.} and Paula Quinteiro and Lu{\'i}s Arroja and Cl{\'a}udia Carvalho-Santos and Cunha-e-S{\'a}, {Maria A.} and Dias, {Ana Cl{\'a}udia}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.wre.2018.06.002",
language = "English",
journal = "Water Resources and Economics",
issn = "2212-4284",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Surface vs. groundwater : the effect of forest cover on the costs of drinking water. / Lopes, Ana Faria; Macdonald, Jacob L.; Quinteiro, Paula; Arroja, Luís; Carvalho-Santos, Cláudia; Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.; Dias, Ana Cláudia.

In: Water Resources and Economics, 10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface vs. groundwater

T2 - the effect of forest cover on the costs of drinking water

AU - Lopes, Ana Faria

AU - Macdonald, Jacob L.

AU - Quinteiro, Paula

AU - Arroja, Luís

AU - Carvalho-Santos, Cláudia

AU - Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A.

AU - Dias, Ana Cláudia

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Forests worldwide provide a variety of ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, soil protection and water purification. In particular, the minimal use of pesticides and fertilizers in forest operations coupled with the tree root system are associated with higher drinking water quality. However, forest coverage is expected to have a more influential impact in groundwater quality rather than surface as well as, consequently, on drinking water treatment costs. This study uses cross sectional data at firm level to assess the marginal effect of forest cover on drinking water treatment costs for the case of Portugal, the first of its kind for the country. Our analysis makes use of a range of GIS and spatial variables which capture the heterogeneity in local forest coverage. The results obtained suggest the existence of a positive and significant effect of local forest cover on water treatment cost savings of 0.056%. However, this effect applies to firms extracting water from groundwater intakes. Neighboring measures of forest coverage have a greater impact on costs from surface water firms. The crucial role of local forest coverage through groundwater provision relates to a problem of intertemporal variation of those costs. Given the expected impact of climate change on precipitation in some regions where drinking water is mostly supplied by groundwater intakes, and since around 97% of forest land is privately owned, these results may suggest that appropriate incentives (e.g., payments for ecosystem services) could contribute to ensuring the sustainable use of water and forest resources.

AB - Forests worldwide provide a variety of ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, soil protection and water purification. In particular, the minimal use of pesticides and fertilizers in forest operations coupled with the tree root system are associated with higher drinking water quality. However, forest coverage is expected to have a more influential impact in groundwater quality rather than surface as well as, consequently, on drinking water treatment costs. This study uses cross sectional data at firm level to assess the marginal effect of forest cover on drinking water treatment costs for the case of Portugal, the first of its kind for the country. Our analysis makes use of a range of GIS and spatial variables which capture the heterogeneity in local forest coverage. The results obtained suggest the existence of a positive and significant effect of local forest cover on water treatment cost savings of 0.056%. However, this effect applies to firms extracting water from groundwater intakes. Neighboring measures of forest coverage have a greater impact on costs from surface water firms. The crucial role of local forest coverage through groundwater provision relates to a problem of intertemporal variation of those costs. Given the expected impact of climate change on precipitation in some regions where drinking water is mostly supplied by groundwater intakes, and since around 97% of forest land is privately owned, these results may suggest that appropriate incentives (e.g., payments for ecosystem services) could contribute to ensuring the sustainable use of water and forest resources.

KW - Forest coverage

KW - Water purification

KW - Water treatment costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048987153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wre.2018.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.wre.2018.06.002

M3 - Article

JO - Water Resources and Economics

JF - Water Resources and Economics

SN - 2212-4284

M1 - 100123

ER -