TY - JOUR
T1 - Study of extended and generalised finite element methods in 2D and 3D applied to a single edge notched bending test
AU - Morgado, Teresa
AU - Dias, Ricardo
N1 - Funding Information:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00667%2F2020/PT#
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This work used the ABAQUS software to determine the Stress Intensity Factor (SIF), and J Integral solutions using single edge notched bending test and the crack propagation. These tests were based on the experimental single-edge notched bending test in a specimen obtained from railway component ASTM A148 90-60. Two simulation techniques were studied to obtain the solutions: the conventional finite element method and the extended finite element method (XFEM). Furthermore, a comparison was developed between the results obtained from the two methods considering the two (2D) and three (3D) dimension models and the experimental results. Posteriorly, the fatigue study was performed through the conventional finite element method, and the stress intensity factor solutions were determined to compare with the experimentally obtained results. In conclusion, using the conventional method to obtain the SIF and J Integral solutions has proved to be very efficient in 2D and 3D, presenting a better precision of results in the two-dimensional model. However, for 3D, the XFEM method obtains J-integral and FIT solutions more accurately than the conventional method. Furthermore, the mesh refinement using conventional and XFEM methods proved that the refinement might not significantly impact the FIT and J Integral solutions.
AB - This work used the ABAQUS software to determine the Stress Intensity Factor (SIF), and J Integral solutions using single edge notched bending test and the crack propagation. These tests were based on the experimental single-edge notched bending test in a specimen obtained from railway component ASTM A148 90-60. Two simulation techniques were studied to obtain the solutions: the conventional finite element method and the extended finite element method (XFEM). Furthermore, a comparison was developed between the results obtained from the two methods considering the two (2D) and three (3D) dimension models and the experimental results. Posteriorly, the fatigue study was performed through the conventional finite element method, and the stress intensity factor solutions were determined to compare with the experimentally obtained results. In conclusion, using the conventional method to obtain the SIF and J Integral solutions has proved to be very efficient in 2D and 3D, presenting a better precision of results in the two-dimensional model. However, for 3D, the XFEM method obtains J-integral and FIT solutions more accurately than the conventional method. Furthermore, the mesh refinement using conventional and XFEM methods proved that the refinement might not significantly impact the FIT and J Integral solutions.
KW - Conventional Finite Element Method
KW - Fatigue
KW - Railway component
KW - XFEM Method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171983879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.07.031
DO - 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.07.031
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85171983879
SN - 2452-3216
VL - 47
SP - 882
EP - 887
JO - Procedia Structural Integrity
JF - Procedia Structural Integrity
T2 - 27th International Conference on Fracture and Structural Integrity, IGF 2023
Y2 - 22 February 2023 through 24 February 2023
ER -