TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: results from 27 case studies
AU - Dick, Jan
AU - Turkelboom, Francis
AU - Woods, Helen
AU - Iniesta-Arandia, Irene
AU - Primmer, Eeva
AU - Saarela, Sanna Riikka
AU - Bezák, Peter
AU - Mederly, Peter
AU - Leone, Michael
AU - Verheyden, Wim
AU - Kelemen, Eszter
AU - Hauck, Jennifer
AU - Andrews, Chris
AU - Antunes, Paula
AU - Aszalós, Réka
AU - Baró, Francesc
AU - Barton, David N.
AU - Berry, Pam
AU - Bugter, Rob
AU - Carvalho, Laurence
AU - Czúcz, Bálint
AU - Dunford, Rob
AU - Garcia Blanco, Gemma
AU - Geamănă, Nicoleta
AU - Giucă, Relu
AU - Grizzetti, Bruna
AU - Izakovičová, Zita
AU - Kertész, Miklós
AU - Kopperoinen, Leena
AU - Langemeyer, Johannes
AU - Montenegro Lapola, David
AU - Liquete, Camino
AU - Luque, Sandra
AU - Martínez Pastur, Guillermo
AU - Martin-Lopez, Berta
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Raktima
AU - Niemela, Jari
AU - Odee, David
AU - Peri, Pablo Luis
AU - Pinho, Patricia
AU - Patrício-Roberto, Gleiciani Bürger
AU - Preda, Elena
AU - Priess, Joerg
AU - Röckmann, Christine
AU - Santos, Rui
AU - Silaghi, Diana
AU - Smith, Ron
AU - Vădineanu, Angheluţă
AU - van der Wal, Jan Tjalling
AU - Arany, Ildikó
N1 - This research was funded by the European Union EU FP7 project OpenNESS (Grant agreement No. 308428).
Sem PDF conforme despacho.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - The ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners’ perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning.
AB - The ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners’ perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning.
KW - Ecosystem services operationalisation
KW - Evaluation
KW - Place-based implementation
KW - Stakeholder perceptions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031403911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031403911
SN - 2212-0416
VL - 29
SP - 552
EP - 565
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
ER -