TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder perspectives on landslide triggers and impacts in five countries
AU - Tayebi, Safiyeh
AU - Jabed, Md Akib
AU - Ruano, Ana Lorena
AU - Lee, Gwenyth O.
AU - da Silva, Paula F.
AU - Ahmed, Saleh
AU - G, Edier V.Aristizábal
AU - Dahal, Ranjan Kumar
AU - Soltani, Arezoo
AU - Imran Khan, Mohammad
AU - Rahman, Md Atiqur
AU - Islam, M. Ashraful
AU - Haque, Ubydul
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to the Civil Societies representatives for taking the time to participate in this research. P. F. da Silva\u2019s contribution was funded by Funda\u00E7\u00E3o para a Ci\u00EAncia e a Tecnologia I.P. through the research unit GeoBioTec grant UIDP/GEO/04035/2020. Ubydul Haque and Gwenyth Lee were supported by Rutgers Global Health Institute.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Expert perspectives drive landslide mitigation and post-disaster policy planning. This study examines landslide risk perceptions among the stakeholders (government officials, academics, policy experts, local community representatives, and representatives of NGOs/civil society) across Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, Iran, and Pakistan, identifying both shared concerns and local heterogeneity. Key informants revealed a discrepancy in their degree of concern about landslides, with government officials exhibiting greater apprehension compared to local community representatives. Local community representatives incorrectly perceived landslides to be the result of natural phenomena. In contrast, governmental and academic stakeholders felt that human-induced triggers, specifically those related to land use and land cover change, were significant contributors to landslide occurrences, necessitating stringent law enforcement. The comprehensive impacts of landslides included economic losses, infrastructure disruption, agricultural losses, and food security concerns, underscoring the multifaceted nature of this hazard. Our results suggest the need for proactive citizen engagement in landslide monitoring, recognizing the importance of local contexts. We end by proposing a dual-pronged policy approach that emphasizes the socio-economic context of each region.
AB - Expert perspectives drive landslide mitigation and post-disaster policy planning. This study examines landslide risk perceptions among the stakeholders (government officials, academics, policy experts, local community representatives, and representatives of NGOs/civil society) across Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, Iran, and Pakistan, identifying both shared concerns and local heterogeneity. Key informants revealed a discrepancy in their degree of concern about landslides, with government officials exhibiting greater apprehension compared to local community representatives. Local community representatives incorrectly perceived landslides to be the result of natural phenomena. In contrast, governmental and academic stakeholders felt that human-induced triggers, specifically those related to land use and land cover change, were significant contributors to landslide occurrences, necessitating stringent law enforcement. The comprehensive impacts of landslides included economic losses, infrastructure disruption, agricultural losses, and food security concerns, underscoring the multifaceted nature of this hazard. Our results suggest the need for proactive citizen engagement in landslide monitoring, recognizing the importance of local contexts. We end by proposing a dual-pronged policy approach that emphasizes the socio-economic context of each region.
KW - Key informant’s perspective
KW - Land use/land cover changes
KW - Landslides
KW - Multi-country analysis
KW - Stakeholder’s dialogue
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193008344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10346-024-02270-4
DO - 10.1007/s10346-024-02270-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193008344
SN - 1612-510X
VL - 21
SP - 2033
EP - 2043
JO - Landslides
JF - Landslides
IS - 8
ER -