@inbook{a01e6d9154e041b5ace197bfd72da536,
title = "Seeking Evidence",
abstract = "7.1 Theoretical fragility and natural solidity of our situation—Evidence as immediate—Does it make sense to seek for a justification of evidence?—Wittgenstein and the indefeasibility of our “system of evidence”—Two kinds of doubt: their local and global epistemological effects—Certainty and security—Greco on the epistemic status of “contextually basic beliefs” in Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s later writings—Hinge propositions: what they are and what they are for—Idea of natural ontology—Wittgensteinian contextualism and the thereness of our evidence. 7.2 Gil on common and scientific evidence—The non-discursiveness of what presents itself to us as evident: idea of “hallucination”—Evidence as transpositional in regard to all perceptive content: the status of this primordial modality—Why evidence is groundless. 7.3 Primary and secondary evidence—Gil on assent: reminiscences of Zeno—The difficulty of invalidating the feeling of reality prompted by our acts of assent. 7.4 Gil{\textquoteright}s effort to avoid a transcendental deduction: an evidence that does not depend on us—The phantasm of a modal categorization—Similarities between Husserl and Gil apropos of the genesis of evidence—Pritchard on “epistemic angst” and “epistemic vertigo”: the phenomenological basis of the latter—Williams{\textquoteright} dismissal of “knowledge-specific scepticism”: beyond the sceptical problems of typical contextualist analyses.",
keywords = "Assent, Certainty, Gil, Hinge propositions, Pritchard, Wittgenstein",
author = "Nuno Venturinha",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 ",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-00154-4_7",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-00153-7",
series = "SpringerBriefs in Philosophy",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "49--56",
editor = "Nuno Venturinha",
booktitle = "Description of Situations",
address = "Netherlands",
}