TY - JOUR
T1 - Seeing the Unreal
T2 - Husserlian Insights into the Nature of Images
AU - Rozzoni, Claudio
N1 - UIDB/00183/2020
UIDP/00183/2020
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper aims to discuss some of the ways in which Husserliana XXIII (1980), i.e. the volume containing most of Edmund Husserl’s unpublished works on image and phantasy consciousness, can provide a seminal contribution to the contemporary theories of images on a wide-ranging level. I will first lay out how, in the third part of his famous 1904/1905 Göttingen lectures ‘Phantasy and Image Consciousness’, Husserl comes to affirm that phantasy consciousness does not rely on the mediation of mental images. Indeed, I will maintain that in ruling out the possibility of interpreting phantasy representation as imaging (Bildlichkeit) representation, Husserl discovers the ‘reproductive’ structure of phantasy. In this view, phantasy experience reveals itself to be the counterpart of the perceptual experience. I will then argue that such outcomes can in turn bear on Husserl’s account of image consciousness, which can finally be understood as a specific case of perzeptive Phantasie. Finally, I will endeavour to show how these phenomenological results can shed light on crucial issues raised by analytic philosophy regarding the nature of depiction, precisely concerning the role played by imagination in it.
AB - This paper aims to discuss some of the ways in which Husserliana XXIII (1980), i.e. the volume containing most of Edmund Husserl’s unpublished works on image and phantasy consciousness, can provide a seminal contribution to the contemporary theories of images on a wide-ranging level. I will first lay out how, in the third part of his famous 1904/1905 Göttingen lectures ‘Phantasy and Image Consciousness’, Husserl comes to affirm that phantasy consciousness does not rely on the mediation of mental images. Indeed, I will maintain that in ruling out the possibility of interpreting phantasy representation as imaging (Bildlichkeit) representation, Husserl discovers the ‘reproductive’ structure of phantasy. In this view, phantasy experience reveals itself to be the counterpart of the perceptual experience. I will then argue that such outcomes can in turn bear on Husserl’s account of image consciousness, which can finally be understood as a specific case of perzeptive Phantasie. Finally, I will endeavour to show how these phenomenological results can shed light on crucial issues raised by analytic philosophy regarding the nature of depiction, precisely concerning the role played by imagination in it.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100758339&origin=inward&txGid=f5b8575caad6715046604362423c23c0
M3 - Article
SN - 1406-2860
VL - 29
SP - 57
EP - 70
JO - Studies on Art and Architecture
JF - Studies on Art and Architecture
IS - 3-4
ER -