TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety of incidental exposure to the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 in pregnancy
T2 - A longitudinal observational study in Mozambique, 2022–2023
AU - de Deus, Nilsa
AU - Chissaque, Assucênio
AU - Bauhofer, Adilson
AU - Barata, Américo
AU - Jani, Ilesh Vinodrai
AU - Lopez Cavestany, Rocio
AU - Jeyaseelan, Visalakshi
AU - Mach, Ondrej
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by The World Health Organization through a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the in-country team in Mozambique from Instituto Nacional de Saúde (INS) for collaboration with the study implementation: Nádia Muate, Alberto Paulo Jr, Aniceto Jemusse, Analoyd Machava, Belmira Banze, Bista Caetano, Carolina Conjo, Carmélia Massingue, Casimira Cala, Cujali Joaquim, Eleonora Nvumba, Hermínia Novele, Laurinda Sumalique, Olga Maquessene, Ruth Delfim, Sabino Rancho, Sara Perner, and Tobias Buce. We would like to thank Dr. Ritter Von Xylander from the WHO Mozambique Country Office. Most importantly, we would like to acknowledge the mothers and infants who participated in this study by providing indispensable data to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. This work was supported by The World Health Organization through a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant. Obtained from the National Health Bioethics Committee for Health in Mozambique and the WHO Ethical Review Committee. Deidentified data can be made available upon request. All authors have participated in the research and/or article preparation. All authors have approved the final article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/2/27
Y1 - 2024/2/27
N2 - Background: To minimize the risk of vaccine-derived poliovirus emergences, the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), was bioengineered to have increased genetic stability compared to Sabin OPV and recommended for outbreak response Emergency Use Listing by WHO. Although pregnant women are not a target population for this vaccine, a theoretical risk of incidental exposure exists via pharyngeal or faecal shedding from vaccinated children in the household or close community. Methods: This was an observational study of pregnant women conducted in Nampula (exposed cohort) and Maputo (non-exposed cohort) in Mozambique from August 2022 to June 2023. Two nOPV2 campaigns were conducted in Nampula and none in Maputo. Women were followed-up during routine prenatal consultation, delivery, and 28-day neonate visits for obstetric anomalies and pregnancy outcomes. Sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric history was captured. Results: Three hundred twenty-six pregnant women were enrolled from Nampula and 940 from Maputo City. Stillbirth prevalence (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·438), low birth weight (8·9% vs 8·2%, p = 0·989), congenital anomalies (1 % vs 0·5%, p = 0·454), neonatal death (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·08), and maternal death (0 % vs 0·2%, p = 0·978) did not differ amongst exposed and non-exposed cohorts. There was an increased rate of pre-term delivery in the exposed cohort (18·4% vs 11·0%, p = 0·011). Conclusion: We did not observe an increased frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to passive nOPV2 exposure. A higher frequency of preterm delivery needs to be further investigated. The data reported herein support the continued use of nOPV2 for poliovirus outbreak response and full licensure of the vaccine.
AB - Background: To minimize the risk of vaccine-derived poliovirus emergences, the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), was bioengineered to have increased genetic stability compared to Sabin OPV and recommended for outbreak response Emergency Use Listing by WHO. Although pregnant women are not a target population for this vaccine, a theoretical risk of incidental exposure exists via pharyngeal or faecal shedding from vaccinated children in the household or close community. Methods: This was an observational study of pregnant women conducted in Nampula (exposed cohort) and Maputo (non-exposed cohort) in Mozambique from August 2022 to June 2023. Two nOPV2 campaigns were conducted in Nampula and none in Maputo. Women were followed-up during routine prenatal consultation, delivery, and 28-day neonate visits for obstetric anomalies and pregnancy outcomes. Sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric history was captured. Results: Three hundred twenty-six pregnant women were enrolled from Nampula and 940 from Maputo City. Stillbirth prevalence (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·438), low birth weight (8·9% vs 8·2%, p = 0·989), congenital anomalies (1 % vs 0·5%, p = 0·454), neonatal death (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·08), and maternal death (0 % vs 0·2%, p = 0·978) did not differ amongst exposed and non-exposed cohorts. There was an increased rate of pre-term delivery in the exposed cohort (18·4% vs 11·0%, p = 0·011). Conclusion: We did not observe an increased frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to passive nOPV2 exposure. A higher frequency of preterm delivery needs to be further investigated. The data reported herein support the continued use of nOPV2 for poliovirus outbreak response and full licensure of the vaccine.
KW - Mozambique
KW - Novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2
KW - Poliovirus
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Vaccine safety
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184063749
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.071
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.071
M3 - Article
C2 - 38307745
AN - SCOPUS:85184063749
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 42
SP - 1326
EP - 1331
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 6
ER -