Abstract
The early modern Portuguese empire presents a variety of case studies to explore the process of border making experienced in direct response to European activity and imperialism. Considering its scale and dispersion, the Portuguese empire shows both fluidity and rigidity of borders and the strategies of control and security taken in response to or within their establishments. The Portuguese factory of São Jorge da Mina, that was built in 1482, and Macao, one of the most important European harbours in Asia in the 1550s, offer valuable insights into early Portuguese/non-European relations. Both cases constitute a concession of a limited and well-defined land where the Portuguese could stay, with full control, resulting from agreement with the terms stipulated by the local authorities. Considering the asymmetries of historiography when treating the two cases, rather than a direct comparison, this article aims to bring some reflections on these experiences as paradigms of the limit of action of the early modern Portuguese empire.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 32-57 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of the British Academy |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Aug 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Portuguese Empire
- Governance
- port cities
- Early Modern History
- Sovereignty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'São Jorge da Mina and Macao: a comparative reappraisal of European encounters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver