TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of vertebral corner inflammation and fat deposition on MRI on syndesmophyte development detected on whole spine low-dose CT scan in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
AU - Stal, Rosalinde
AU - Baraliakos, Xenofon
AU - van der Heijde, Désirée
AU - van Gaalen, Floris
AU - Ramiro, Sofia
AU - van den Berg, Rosaline
AU - Reijnierse, Monique
AU - Braun, Juergen
AU - Landewé, Robert
AU - Sepriano, Alexandre
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/7/8
Y1 - 2022/7/8
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between MRI detected vertebral corner inflammation (VCI) and vertebral corner fat deposition (VCFD) on whole spine low-dose CT scan (ldCT) detected syndesmophyte formation and growth. METHODS: Patients from the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort underwent MRI (baseline, 1 year and 2 years) and ldCT (baseline and 2 years). MR images were scored by three readers for VCI and VCFD, MRI patterns were defined by presence of VCI and/or VCFD over 2 years. LdCT images were scored by two central readers for presence and size of syndesmophytes and change was calculated for new or new/grown syndesmophytes. Multilevel generalised estimated equations were used to test the associations between VCI and VCFD and syndesmophyte development. RESULTS: Fifty radiographic patients with axial spondyloarthritis were included (mean age 49 years, 86% male, 78% HLA-B27+). Absence of both VCI and VCFD protected against syndesmophyte development (ORs 0.36-0.37). Presence of VCI and/or VCFD increased the risk of syndesmophyte development (ORs 1.73-2.60). Out of all corners with a new or new/grown syndesmophyte, 47% of corners according to reader 1 and 44% according to reader 2 had neither VCI nor VCFD preceding the bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: VCI and VCFD were positively associated with syndesmophyte development. This has been shown for the first time for syndesmophytes detected on ldCT and also in the thoracic spine. However, almost half of all bone formation occurred in corners without VCI or VCFD, suggesting the presence of these lesions in yearly MRIs does not fully clarify the development of syndesmophytes.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between MRI detected vertebral corner inflammation (VCI) and vertebral corner fat deposition (VCFD) on whole spine low-dose CT scan (ldCT) detected syndesmophyte formation and growth. METHODS: Patients from the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort underwent MRI (baseline, 1 year and 2 years) and ldCT (baseline and 2 years). MR images were scored by three readers for VCI and VCFD, MRI patterns were defined by presence of VCI and/or VCFD over 2 years. LdCT images were scored by two central readers for presence and size of syndesmophytes and change was calculated for new or new/grown syndesmophytes. Multilevel generalised estimated equations were used to test the associations between VCI and VCFD and syndesmophyte development. RESULTS: Fifty radiographic patients with axial spondyloarthritis were included (mean age 49 years, 86% male, 78% HLA-B27+). Absence of both VCI and VCFD protected against syndesmophyte development (ORs 0.36-0.37). Presence of VCI and/or VCFD increased the risk of syndesmophyte development (ORs 1.73-2.60). Out of all corners with a new or new/grown syndesmophyte, 47% of corners according to reader 1 and 44% according to reader 2 had neither VCI nor VCFD preceding the bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: VCI and VCFD were positively associated with syndesmophyte development. This has been shown for the first time for syndesmophytes detected on ldCT and also in the thoracic spine. However, almost half of all bone formation occurred in corners without VCI or VCFD, suggesting the presence of these lesions in yearly MRIs does not fully clarify the development of syndesmophytes.
KW - inflammation
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - spondylitis, ankylosing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134425962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002250
DO - 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002250
M3 - Article
C2 - 35803614
AN - SCOPUS:85134425962
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 8
JO - RMD Open
JF - RMD Open
IS - 2
M1 - e002250
ER -