TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Management in Clinical Trials
T2 - Assessment of Current Practices at Portuguese Clinical Trial Sites
AU - Vale, Margarida
AU - Leite, Francisca
AU - Madeira, Catarina
N1 -
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge PtCRIN and all participating healthcare institutions for their availability to answer the survey and contribute to this research. CM acknowledges funding support from Portuguese public funding through Investimento RE-C05-i02 – Missão Interface N.° 01/C05-i02/2022
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Vale et al.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Purpose: Over the last years, in response to the increasing complexity and demand of clinical trials, there has been a growing concern with the application of efficient risk management methodologies. The main objective of this work is to assess the current level of implementation of risk management activities by clinical trials sites’ teams and identify points of improvement. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted through an original, non-validated questionnaire created to assess the risk management practices at Portuguese clinical trial sites. The web-based survey was sent by e-mail to the clinical trial sites identified, and it was available for one month. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Results: In total, 46 clinical trial sites accepted to participate in this study. The surveys’ answers showed that although 57.0% of sites reported the use of a systematic risk management tool, only nine sites (19.6%) described a standard tool or document that captured systematically the analysis of risks at the site level. Most of the sites (87.0%) showed willing to use a risk management tool specifically tailored for their operational needs, with the lack of knowledge about risk management being the main reason against its implementation. Conclusion: This work indicates that the surveyed clinical trial sites generally recognize the importance of risk management methodologies as an opportunity to anticipate difficulties in the trial conduct and optimize the use of sites’ resources. However, mainly due to lack of experience with risk management methodologies, sites are not currently implementing these strategies in the management of their trial-related operations. The development of a risk management tool for sites can be useful in this context.
AB - Purpose: Over the last years, in response to the increasing complexity and demand of clinical trials, there has been a growing concern with the application of efficient risk management methodologies. The main objective of this work is to assess the current level of implementation of risk management activities by clinical trials sites’ teams and identify points of improvement. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted through an original, non-validated questionnaire created to assess the risk management practices at Portuguese clinical trial sites. The web-based survey was sent by e-mail to the clinical trial sites identified, and it was available for one month. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Results: In total, 46 clinical trial sites accepted to participate in this study. The surveys’ answers showed that although 57.0% of sites reported the use of a systematic risk management tool, only nine sites (19.6%) described a standard tool or document that captured systematically the analysis of risks at the site level. Most of the sites (87.0%) showed willing to use a risk management tool specifically tailored for their operational needs, with the lack of knowledge about risk management being the main reason against its implementation. Conclusion: This work indicates that the surveyed clinical trial sites generally recognize the importance of risk management methodologies as an opportunity to anticipate difficulties in the trial conduct and optimize the use of sites’ resources. However, mainly due to lack of experience with risk management methodologies, sites are not currently implementing these strategies in the management of their trial-related operations. The development of a risk management tool for sites can be useful in this context.
KW - clinical research
KW - healthcare
KW - operational risks
KW - planning
KW - risk assessment tool
KW - trial feasibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175013338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/RMHP.S426411
DO - 10.2147/RMHP.S426411
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175013338
SN - 1179-1594
VL - 16
SP - 2187
EP - 2196
JO - Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
JF - Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
ER -