TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisitando definições e naturezas da intersetorialidade
T2 - um ensaio teórico
AU - Prado, Nília Maria de Brito Lima
AU - Aquino, Rosana
AU - Hartz, Zulmira Maria de Araújo
AU - Dos Santos, Hebert Luan Pereira Campos
AU - Medina, Maria Guadalupe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Associacao Brasileira de Pos - Graduacao em Saude Coletiva. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This theoretical essay addresses definitions and central characteristics of intersectoral actions for health. It aims, therefore, to reflect on the knowledge produced about the conceptions and nature of health intersectoral actions. An inte-grative review was conducted for the construction of the analyses from publications referring to the 2000-2019 period identified in the Lilacs, SciELO, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases. The corpus included 12 papers, with aspects related to the aim, purpose or method of intersectoral action under analysis, outlining similarities and contrasts between definitions. Given the opacity in the construction of definitions, we had to point out a socio-historical construction of the concepts, and that the provisional definitions express a certain blurring or erasure in dispute within the field of health that can lead to different viewpoints and are barriers to include the implementation of in-tersectoral actions related to health promotion in daily practices. Such reflections derived a set of propositions about the nature of intersectoral health actions that aim to contribute to the debate on the theme.
AB - This theoretical essay addresses definitions and central characteristics of intersectoral actions for health. It aims, therefore, to reflect on the knowledge produced about the conceptions and nature of health intersectoral actions. An inte-grative review was conducted for the construction of the analyses from publications referring to the 2000-2019 period identified in the Lilacs, SciELO, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases. The corpus included 12 papers, with aspects related to the aim, purpose or method of intersectoral action under analysis, outlining similarities and contrasts between definitions. Given the opacity in the construction of definitions, we had to point out a socio-historical construction of the concepts, and that the provisional definitions express a certain blurring or erasure in dispute within the field of health that can lead to different viewpoints and are barriers to include the implementation of in-tersectoral actions related to health promotion in daily practices. Such reflections derived a set of propositions about the nature of intersectoral health actions that aim to contribute to the debate on the theme.
KW - Intersectoral action
KW - Intersectoral collaboration
KW - Intersectoral health action
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124332234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/1413-81232022272.47042020
DO - 10.1590/1413-81232022272.47042020
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35137815
AN - SCOPUS:85124332234
SN - 1413-8123
VL - 27
SP - 593
EP - 602
JO - Ciencia e Saude Coletiva
JF - Ciencia e Saude Coletiva
IS - 2
ER -