TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking Digital Technology versus Paper and Pencil in 3D Geometry
AU - Viseu, Floriano
AU - Rocha, Helena
AU - Monteiro, José Manuel
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04647%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04647%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F01661%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F01661%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/PTDC%2FCED-EDG%2F32422%2F2017/PT#
UIDB/04647/2020
UIDP/04647/2020
UIDB/01661/2020
UIDP/01661/2020
PTDC/CED-EDG/32422/2017
PY - 2022/7/19
Y1 - 2022/7/19
N2 - Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.
AB - Recognising the relevance of learning Geometry, and in particular 3D Geometry, this study aims to discuss the contributions that digital technology and paper and pencil approaches can bring to students’ learning. We seek, therefore, to identify the differences between the two approaches, and specifically: What factors are relevant in one and the other approach? What does one approach facilitate over the other? A quantitative and a qualitative and interpretive methodology was adopted, and based on a didactic intervention, the students' resolutions of the proposed tasks were analysed. The results obtained show that the experience and prior knowledge of the students with each of the solids involved seems to be decisive in the approach with paper and pencil. However, technology emerges as an enhancing resource when prior knowledge is more fragile. The study also shows differences between the representations supported by the two resources, suggesting the mobilisation of different knowledge by the students in relation to each of the resources.
KW - 3D Geometry
KW - Digital technology
KW - Learning
KW - Paper and pencil
KW - Secondary education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134581314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645
DO - 10.56059/jl4d.v9i2.645
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134581314
SN - 2311-1550
VL - 9
SP - 267
EP - 278
JO - Journal of Learning for Development
JF - Journal of Learning for Development
IS - 2
ER -