Response of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite to a fire cycle in a fire-resistant steel

J. D. Escobar, P. M. Delfino, E. A. Ariza-Echeverri, F. M. Carvalho, Norbert Schell, Andreas Stark, Tiago A. Rodrigues, João Pedro Oliveira, Julian A. Avila, H. Goldenstein, A. P. Tschiptschin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the kinetics of microstructural degradation during the event of a fire is of major relevance to future optimization of fire-resistant steels (FRS). In this work, we use in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction to assess the rapid thermally-assisted degradation of different starting microstructures, such as (i) ferrite + pearlite; (ii) bainite + retained austenite, and (iii) martensite + retained austenite, during the simulation of a fire cycle in a Fe-0.13C-0.11Cr-0.38Mo-0.04V FRS. Our results show that retained austenite is the most unstable phase, especially when generated by faster cooling rates, decomposing at temperatures as low as 180 °C during fire simulations. Bainite and martensite are both unstable and undergo recovery and carbon desaturation via secondary precipitation of cementite. However, bainite is comparatively more stable than martensite since its decomposition starts at 400 °C, while for martensite it occurs at 320 °C. We also present a methodology to deconvolute the effect of temperature on the increased background and signal intensities of the X-ray spectra, allowing the direct observation of the kinetics of secondary cementite precipitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111567
JournalMaterials Characterization
Volume182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Fire-resistant steel
  • Retained austenite
  • Secondary cementite
  • Synchrotron X-ray diffraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite to a fire cycle in a fire-resistant steel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this