Abstract
P.F. Strawson in “Freedom and Resentment” argues that it is self-contradictory for abnormality to be the universal condition. This argument is claimed by Paul Russell (Ethics, 102, 287–302, 1992) to be faulty because conflating abnormality and incapacity, there being no contradiction involved in incapacity being a universal condition. Russell’s critique has become the mainstream view, but it will be shown that from the first-person point of view, universal incapacity could not be any basis on which we could in practice modify our attitudes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 242 |
Pages (from-to) | 157-169 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Acta Analytica |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 12 Oct 2015 |
Keywords
- Compatibilism
- Paul Russell
- Resentment
- Strawson