TY - JOUR
T1 - Recycling of crushed concrete and steel slag in drainage structures of geotechnical works and road pavements
AU - Roque, António José
AU - da Silva, Paula F.
AU - de Almeida, Rui Pedro Marques
N1 - Funding Information:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04035%2F2020/PT#
The authors acknowledge to Demotri company (Ambigroup Group), Portuguese Iron and Steel company, Alves Ribeiro company, Agrepor company, and Amarsul company (AdP Group), for providing the materials used in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - A crushed concrete aggregate, processed from construction and demolition waste and a siderurgical aggregate, processed from electric arc furnace steel slag, were selected based on their very high availability worldwide and known technical feasibility to be used in construction works. Given the association of their presence to the possibility of reducing the drainage capacity of unbound granular layers of road pavements and drainage structures which they may be associated with, there are studies and regulations that do not recommend their use. The causes that are at the origin of restrictions are mainly the possibility of formation of tufa and recementation phenomena. This behaviour has also hampered their recycling in drainage structures of geotechnical works. Therefore, it was considered that it would be relevant to investigate the drainage capacity of those recycled aggregates, using a leachate produced in a municipal solid waste landfill and tap water. To reference their behaviour, two natural aggregates, a basalt and a limestone, were also studied under identical test conditions. The results obtained showed no reduction in the drainage capacity of the recycled aggregates, similarly to what was observed with the natural aggregates. The possibility of building drainage structures with the tested aggregates is verified.
AB - A crushed concrete aggregate, processed from construction and demolition waste and a siderurgical aggregate, processed from electric arc furnace steel slag, were selected based on their very high availability worldwide and known technical feasibility to be used in construction works. Given the association of their presence to the possibility of reducing the drainage capacity of unbound granular layers of road pavements and drainage structures which they may be associated with, there are studies and regulations that do not recommend their use. The causes that are at the origin of restrictions are mainly the possibility of formation of tufa and recementation phenomena. This behaviour has also hampered their recycling in drainage structures of geotechnical works. Therefore, it was considered that it would be relevant to investigate the drainage capacity of those recycled aggregates, using a leachate produced in a municipal solid waste landfill and tap water. To reference their behaviour, two natural aggregates, a basalt and a limestone, were also studied under identical test conditions. The results obtained showed no reduction in the drainage capacity of the recycled aggregates, similarly to what was observed with the natural aggregates. The possibility of building drainage structures with the tested aggregates is verified.
KW - Construction and demolition waste
KW - Drainage layers
KW - Hydraulic conductivity
KW - Recycling
KW - Steel slag
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137201578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10163-022-01486-7
DO - 10.1007/s10163-022-01486-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 36039090
AN - SCOPUS:85137201578
SN - 1438-4957
VL - 24
SP - 2385
EP - 2400
JO - Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
JF - Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
IS - 6
ER -