Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients

where are we now and where are we heading?

Deborah Seys, An Sermon, Walter Sermeus, Massimiliano Panella, Luk Bruyneel, Paulo Boto, Kris Vanhaecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines on the prevention and treatment of geriatric hip fractures, the percentage of recommended care received by patients is low. We conducted an importance–performance analysis for prioritizing interventions to improve the in-hospital management of these patients. Materials and methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the in-hospital treatment of 540 geriatric hip fracture patients in 34 hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and Portugal. First, we assessed the level of expert consensus on the process indicators composing international guidelines on hip fracture treatment. Second, guideline adherence on in-hospital care was evaluated within and across hospitals. Third, an importance–performance analysis was conducted, linking expert consensus to guideline adherence. Results: Level of expert consensus was high (above 75%) for 12 of 22 process indicators identified from the literature. There is large between and within hospital variation in guideline adherence for these indicators and for none of the 540 patients were all 22 process indicators adhered to. Importance–performance analysis demonstrated that three indicators that had a high level of expert consensus also had a high level of adherence (above 80%). Nine indicators, most of which have been previously linked to patient outcomes, had a high level of expert consensus but a consistently low level of adherence across hospitals and are identified as priority areas for improvement. Conclusions: Guideline adherence for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients is remarkably suboptimal. Importance–performance analysis is a useful strategic approach to assist practitioners and healthcare managers to improve the quality of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1077-1087
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume138
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Hip Fractures
Geriatrics
Guideline Adherence
Guidelines
Portugal
Quality of Health Care
Belgium
Therapeutics
Italy
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Adherence to guidelines
  • Hip fracture
  • Importance–performance analysis
  • Level of expert consensus
  • Quality of care

Cite this

Seys, Deborah ; Sermon, An ; Sermeus, Walter ; Panella, Massimiliano ; Bruyneel, Luk ; Boto, Paulo ; Vanhaecht, Kris. / Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients : where are we now and where are we heading?. In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 138, No. 8. pp. 1077-1087.
@article{543d347ef70745ac905f47a9014fcd9e,
title = "Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients: where are we now and where are we heading?",
abstract = "Introduction: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines on the prevention and treatment of geriatric hip fractures, the percentage of recommended care received by patients is low. We conducted an importance–performance analysis for prioritizing interventions to improve the in-hospital management of these patients. Materials and methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the in-hospital treatment of 540 geriatric hip fracture patients in 34 hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and Portugal. First, we assessed the level of expert consensus on the process indicators composing international guidelines on hip fracture treatment. Second, guideline adherence on in-hospital care was evaluated within and across hospitals. Third, an importance–performance analysis was conducted, linking expert consensus to guideline adherence. Results: Level of expert consensus was high (above 75{\%}) for 12 of 22 process indicators identified from the literature. There is large between and within hospital variation in guideline adherence for these indicators and for none of the 540 patients were all 22 process indicators adhered to. Importance–performance analysis demonstrated that three indicators that had a high level of expert consensus also had a high level of adherence (above 80{\%}). Nine indicators, most of which have been previously linked to patient outcomes, had a high level of expert consensus but a consistently low level of adherence across hospitals and are identified as priority areas for improvement. Conclusions: Guideline adherence for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients is remarkably suboptimal. Importance–performance analysis is a useful strategic approach to assist practitioners and healthcare managers to improve the quality of care.",
keywords = "Adherence to guidelines, Hip fracture, Importance–performance analysis, Level of expert consensus, Quality of care",
author = "Deborah Seys and An Sermon and Walter Sermeus and Massimiliano Panella and Luk Bruyneel and Paulo Boto and Kris Vanhaecht",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00402-018-2939-4",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "1077--1087",
journal = "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery",
issn = "0936-8051",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "8",

}

Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients : where are we now and where are we heading? / Seys, Deborah; Sermon, An; Sermeus, Walter; Panella, Massimiliano; Bruyneel, Luk; Boto, Paulo; Vanhaecht, Kris.

In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 138, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 1077-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommended care received by geriatric hip fracture patients

T2 - where are we now and where are we heading?

AU - Seys, Deborah

AU - Sermon, An

AU - Sermeus, Walter

AU - Panella, Massimiliano

AU - Bruyneel, Luk

AU - Boto, Paulo

AU - Vanhaecht, Kris

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Introduction: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines on the prevention and treatment of geriatric hip fractures, the percentage of recommended care received by patients is low. We conducted an importance–performance analysis for prioritizing interventions to improve the in-hospital management of these patients. Materials and methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the in-hospital treatment of 540 geriatric hip fracture patients in 34 hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and Portugal. First, we assessed the level of expert consensus on the process indicators composing international guidelines on hip fracture treatment. Second, guideline adherence on in-hospital care was evaluated within and across hospitals. Third, an importance–performance analysis was conducted, linking expert consensus to guideline adherence. Results: Level of expert consensus was high (above 75%) for 12 of 22 process indicators identified from the literature. There is large between and within hospital variation in guideline adherence for these indicators and for none of the 540 patients were all 22 process indicators adhered to. Importance–performance analysis demonstrated that three indicators that had a high level of expert consensus also had a high level of adherence (above 80%). Nine indicators, most of which have been previously linked to patient outcomes, had a high level of expert consensus but a consistently low level of adherence across hospitals and are identified as priority areas for improvement. Conclusions: Guideline adherence for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients is remarkably suboptimal. Importance–performance analysis is a useful strategic approach to assist practitioners and healthcare managers to improve the quality of care.

AB - Introduction: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines on the prevention and treatment of geriatric hip fractures, the percentage of recommended care received by patients is low. We conducted an importance–performance analysis for prioritizing interventions to improve the in-hospital management of these patients. Materials and methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on the in-hospital treatment of 540 geriatric hip fracture patients in 34 hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and Portugal. First, we assessed the level of expert consensus on the process indicators composing international guidelines on hip fracture treatment. Second, guideline adherence on in-hospital care was evaluated within and across hospitals. Third, an importance–performance analysis was conducted, linking expert consensus to guideline adherence. Results: Level of expert consensus was high (above 75%) for 12 of 22 process indicators identified from the literature. There is large between and within hospital variation in guideline adherence for these indicators and for none of the 540 patients were all 22 process indicators adhered to. Importance–performance analysis demonstrated that three indicators that had a high level of expert consensus also had a high level of adherence (above 80%). Nine indicators, most of which have been previously linked to patient outcomes, had a high level of expert consensus but a consistently low level of adherence across hospitals and are identified as priority areas for improvement. Conclusions: Guideline adherence for the treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients is remarkably suboptimal. Importance–performance analysis is a useful strategic approach to assist practitioners and healthcare managers to improve the quality of care.

KW - Adherence to guidelines

KW - Hip fracture

KW - Importance–performance analysis

KW - Level of expert consensus

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046010620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00402-018-2939-4

DO - 10.1007/s00402-018-2939-4

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 1077

EP - 1087

JO - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

JF - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

SN - 0936-8051

IS - 8

ER -