TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-evaluation of nailfold capillaroscopy in discriminating primary from secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon and in predicting systemic sclerosis
T2 - a randomised observational prospective cohort study
AU - Amaral, Marta C.
AU - Paula, F. Seguro
AU - Caetano, Joana
AU - RJ Ames, Paul
AU - Alves, J. Delgado
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Background: Primary Raynaud’s phenomenon (pRP) is difficult to distinguish from secondary (sRP). Although nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) may detect early alterations, no universal criteria yet discriminate between pRP from sRP. Objectives: To create and validate two NFC scores that could distinguish pRP from sRP and that could predict systemic sclerosis (SSc), respectively. Methods: We performed NFC on two separate cohorts with isolated RP, and recorded number of capillaries per field, enlarged/giant capillaries, crossed/bizarre patterns, microhemorrhages, neoangiogenesis, rarefaction, edema, blood flow velocity, stasis. By multivariate regression analysis, we evaluated the adjusted prognostic role of these features in a derivation cohort of 656 patients. Results were used to construct algorithm-based prognostic scores (A and B). These scores were then tested on a confirmation cohort of 219 patients. Results: Score A was unable to discriminate sRP from pRP (low negative predictive values with high positive predictive values for any cut-point); score B was unable to discriminate progression to SSc or a SSc-spectrum disorder (low positive predictive values with high negative predictive values for lower cut-points). Conclusion: NFC patterns, believed as specific, showed low discriminatory power and on their own are unable to reliably discriminate sRP from pRP or predict evolution to SSc.
AB - Background: Primary Raynaud’s phenomenon (pRP) is difficult to distinguish from secondary (sRP). Although nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) may detect early alterations, no universal criteria yet discriminate between pRP from sRP. Objectives: To create and validate two NFC scores that could distinguish pRP from sRP and that could predict systemic sclerosis (SSc), respectively. Methods: We performed NFC on two separate cohorts with isolated RP, and recorded number of capillaries per field, enlarged/giant capillaries, crossed/bizarre patterns, microhemorrhages, neoangiogenesis, rarefaction, edema, blood flow velocity, stasis. By multivariate regression analysis, we evaluated the adjusted prognostic role of these features in a derivation cohort of 656 patients. Results were used to construct algorithm-based prognostic scores (A and B). These scores were then tested on a confirmation cohort of 219 patients. Results: Score A was unable to discriminate sRP from pRP (low negative predictive values with high positive predictive values for any cut-point); score B was unable to discriminate progression to SSc or a SSc-spectrum disorder (low positive predictive values with high negative predictive values for lower cut-points). Conclusion: NFC patterns, believed as specific, showed low discriminatory power and on their own are unable to reliably discriminate sRP from pRP or predict evolution to SSc.
KW - connective tissue disease
KW - Nailfold capillaroscopy
KW - primary Raynaud’s phenomenon
KW - raynaud’s disease
KW - secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon
KW - systemic sclerosis
KW - videocapillaroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187471066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1744666X.2024.2313642
DO - 10.1080/1744666X.2024.2313642
M3 - Article
C2 - 38465507
AN - SCOPUS:85187471066
SN - 1744-666X
VL - 20
SP - 665
EP - 672
JO - Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
JF - Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
IS - 6
ER -