TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Atrial Fibrillation Patients
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Sousa, Susana
AU - Drummond, Marta
AU - Bugalho, António
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by a grant from Jos\u00E9 de Mello Sa\u00FAde.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed sleep disorder with significant cardiovascular implications, namely in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Despite its clinical relevance, OSA prevalence among AF patients and the diagnostic strategies used remain heterogeneous across studies, complicating screening, and treatment pathways. Our aim was to synthesize recent evidence on OSA prevalence in AF populations and to critically evaluate the diagnostic methods and screening strategies employed in clinical studies, by conducting a systematic review using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify original clinical studies published between January-2019 and December-2024. Inclusion criteria targeted adult AF populations assessed for OSA or sleep-disordered breathing. The results were analyzed by two independent reviewers. Non-concordances were resolved by consensus. Data extracted included study characteristics, population profiles, diagnostic approaches, prevalence rates, symptom profiles, and clinical correlates. Thirty-eight studies were included, comprising predominantly observational studies. Prevalence estimates of OSA in AF populations ranged from 5% to 90%, with most studies reporting rates > 60%. A consistent burden of moderate-to-severe OSA was observed. Diagnostic methods varied widely, from polysomnography (PSG) and home sleep apnea testing to pacemaker-derived monitoring and questionnaires such as STOP-Bang and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Underdiagnosis was attributed to minimal symptomatology, lack of physician awareness, and reliance on subjective tools. Several studies highlighted the limited sensitivity of standard screening instruments in AF populations and advocated for objective testing even in asymptomatic patients. Marked heterogeneity in study designs, diagnostic methods, and populations precluded quantitative synthesis and limited direct comparisons. Objective diagnostic testing, particularly PSG, is essential to improve OSA detection rates and guide individualized management. Integration of structured screening protocols into AF care—especially for high-risk patients—and interdisciplinary collaboration are critical.
AB - Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed sleep disorder with significant cardiovascular implications, namely in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Despite its clinical relevance, OSA prevalence among AF patients and the diagnostic strategies used remain heterogeneous across studies, complicating screening, and treatment pathways. Our aim was to synthesize recent evidence on OSA prevalence in AF populations and to critically evaluate the diagnostic methods and screening strategies employed in clinical studies, by conducting a systematic review using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify original clinical studies published between January-2019 and December-2024. Inclusion criteria targeted adult AF populations assessed for OSA or sleep-disordered breathing. The results were analyzed by two independent reviewers. Non-concordances were resolved by consensus. Data extracted included study characteristics, population profiles, diagnostic approaches, prevalence rates, symptom profiles, and clinical correlates. Thirty-eight studies were included, comprising predominantly observational studies. Prevalence estimates of OSA in AF populations ranged from 5% to 90%, with most studies reporting rates > 60%. A consistent burden of moderate-to-severe OSA was observed. Diagnostic methods varied widely, from polysomnography (PSG) and home sleep apnea testing to pacemaker-derived monitoring and questionnaires such as STOP-Bang and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Underdiagnosis was attributed to minimal symptomatology, lack of physician awareness, and reliance on subjective tools. Several studies highlighted the limited sensitivity of standard screening instruments in AF populations and advocated for objective testing even in asymptomatic patients. Marked heterogeneity in study designs, diagnostic methods, and populations precluded quantitative synthesis and limited direct comparisons. Objective diagnostic testing, particularly PSG, is essential to improve OSA detection rates and guide individualized management. Integration of structured screening protocols into AF care—especially for high-risk patients—and interdisciplinary collaboration are critical.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - cardiac arrhythmias
KW - cardiovascular comorbidity
KW - cardiovascular disease
KW - diagnosis
KW - home sleep apnea testing
KW - obstructive sleep apnea
KW - polysomnography
KW - prevalence
KW - risk factors
KW - sleep-disordered breathing
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105014345735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm14165708
DO - 10.3390/jcm14165708
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105014345735
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 16
M1 - 5708
ER -