Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns

Elena L Zvereva; Benjamin Adroit; Tommi Andersson; Craig R  A Barnett; Sofia Branco; Bastien Castagneyrol; Giancarlo Maria Chiarenza; Wesley Dáttilo; Ek del-Val; Jan Filip; Jory Griffith; Anna L Hargreaves; Juan Antonio Hernández-Agüero; Isabelle L  H Silva; Yixuan Hong; Gabriella Kietzka; Petr Klimeš; Max Koistinen; Oksana Y Kruglova; Satu Kumpula; Paula Lopezosa; Marti March-Salas; Robert J Marquis; Yuri M Marusik; Angela T Moles; Anne Muola; Mercy Murkwe; Akihiro Nakamura; Cameron Olson; Emilio Pagani-Núñez; Anna Popova; Olivia Rahn; Alexey Reshchikov; Antonio Rodriguez-Campbell; Seppo Rytkönen; Katerina Sam; Antigoni Sounapoglou; Robert Tropek; Cheng Wenda; Guorui Xu; Yu Zeng; Maxim Zolotarev; Natalia A Zubrii; Vitali Zverev; Mikhail V Kozlov

doi:10.1111/geb.13899

Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns

Elena L Zvereva, Benjamin Adroit, Tommi Andersson, Craig R A Barnett, Sofia Branco, Bastien Castagneyrol, Giancarlo Maria Chiarenza, Wesley Dáttilo, Ek del-Val, Jan Filip, Jory Griffith, Anna L Hargreaves, Juan Antonio Hernández-Agüero, Isabelle L H Silva, Yixuan Hong, Gabriella Kietzka, Petr Klimeš, Max Koistinen, Oksana Y Kruglova, Satu KumpulaPaula Lopezosa, Marti March-Salas, Robert J Marquis, Yuri M Marusik, Angela T Moles, Anne Muola, Mercy Murkwe, Akihiro Nakamura, Cameron Olson, Emilio Pagani-Núñez, Anna Popova, Olivia Rahn, Alexey Reshchikov, Antonio Rodriguez-Campbell, Seppo Rytkönen, Katerina Sam, Antigoni Sounapoglou, Robert Tropek, Cheng Wenda, Guorui Xu, Yu Zeng, Maxim Zolotarev, Natalia A Zubrii, Vitali Zverev, Mikhail V Kozlov

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: Long-standing theory predicts that the intensity of biotic interactions increases from high to low latitudes. Studies addressing geographic variation in predation on insect prey have often relied on prey models, which lack many characteristics of live prey. Our goals were to explore global latitudinal patterns of predator attack rates on standardised live insect prey and to compare the patterns in predation on live insects with those on plasticine prey models. Location: Global forested areas. Time Period: 2021–2023. Major Taxa: Arthropods, birds. Methods: We measured predation rates in 43 forested locations distributed across five continents from 34.1° S to 69.5° N latitude. At each location, we exposed 20 sets of three bait types, one set per tree. Each set included three live fly larvae (maggots), three live fly puparia and three plasticine models of the puparia. We used glue rings to isolate half of the sets from non-flying predators. Results: Arthropod attack rates on plasticine prey decreased linearly from low to high latitudes, whereas attack rates on maggots had a U shaped distribution, with the lowest predation rates at temperate latitudes and the highest rates at tropical and boreal latitudes. This difference emerged from intensive predator attacks on live maggots, but not on plasticine models, in boreal sites. Site-specific attack rates of arthropod predators on live and plasticine prey were not correlated. In contrast, bird attack rates on live maggots and plasticine models were positively correlated, but did not show significant latitudinal changes. Main Conclusions: Latitudinal patterns in predation differ between major groups of predators and between types of prey. Poleward decreases in both arthropod and combined arthropod and bird predation on plasticine models do not mirror patterns of predation on our live prey, the latter likely reflecting real patterns of predation risk better than do patterns of attack on artificial prey.

Original language	English
Article number	e13899
Journal	Global Ecology and Biogeography
Volume	33
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13899
Publication status	Published - Nov 2024

Keywords

ants
arthropod predation
bird predation
forests
latitudinal pattern
live standardised prey
maggots
plasticine prey models
predation risk

Access to Document

10.1111/geb.13899

Global Ecology and Biogeography - 2024 - Zvereva - Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different GlobalFinal published version, 3.36 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Zvereva, EL., Adroit, B., Andersson, T., Barnett, CR. A., Branco, S., Castagneyrol, B., Chiarenza, GM., Dáttilo, W., del-Val, E., Filip, J., Griffith, J., Hargreaves, AL., Hernández-Agüero, JA., Silva, IL. H., Hong, Y., Kietzka, G., Klimeš, P., Koistinen, M., Kruglova, OY., ... Kozlov, MV. (2024). Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 33(11), Article e13899. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13899

@article{8967eda0ed52406d90f52d63a9efedd5,

title = "Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns",

abstract = "Aim: Long-standing theory predicts that the intensity of biotic interactions increases from high to low latitudes. Studies addressing geographic variation in predation on insect prey have often relied on prey models, which lack many characteristics of live prey. Our goals were to explore global latitudinal patterns of predator attack rates on standardised live insect prey and to compare the patterns in predation on live insects with those on plasticine prey models. Location: Global forested areas. Time Period: 2021–2023. Major Taxa: Arthropods, birds. Methods: We measured predation rates in 43 forested locations distributed across five continents from 34.1° S to 69.5° N latitude. At each location, we exposed 20 sets of three bait types, one set per tree. Each set included three live fly larvae (maggots), three live fly puparia and three plasticine models of the puparia. We used glue rings to isolate half of the sets from non-flying predators. Results: Arthropod attack rates on plasticine prey decreased linearly from low to high latitudes, whereas attack rates on maggots had a U shaped distribution, with the lowest predation rates at temperate latitudes and the highest rates at tropical and boreal latitudes. This difference emerged from intensive predator attacks on live maggots, but not on plasticine models, in boreal sites. Site-specific attack rates of arthropod predators on live and plasticine prey were not correlated. In contrast, bird attack rates on live maggots and plasticine models were positively correlated, but did not show significant latitudinal changes. Main Conclusions: Latitudinal patterns in predation differ between major groups of predators and between types of prey. Poleward decreases in both arthropod and combined arthropod and bird predation on plasticine models do not mirror patterns of predation on our live prey, the latter likely reflecting real patterns of predation risk better than do patterns of attack on artificial prey.",

keywords = "ants, arthropod predation, bird predation, forests, latitudinal pattern, live standardised prey, maggots, plasticine prey models, predation risk",

author = "Elena L Zvereva and Benjamin Adroit and Tommi Andersson and Barnett, {Craig R A} and Sofia Branco and Bastien Castagneyrol and Giancarlo Maria Chiarenza and Wesley D{\'a}ttilo and Ek del-Val and Jan Filip and Jory Griffith and Anna L Hargreaves and Juan Antonio Hern{\'a}ndez-Ag{\"u}ero and Silva, {Isabelle L H} and Yixuan Hong and Gabriella Kietzka and Petr Klime{\v s} and Max Koistinen and Oksana Y Kruglova and Satu Kumpula and Paula Lopezosa and Marti March-Salas and Robert J Marquis and Yuri M Marusik and Angela T Moles and Anne Muola and Mercy Murkwe and Akihiro Nakamura and Cameron Olson and Emilio Pagani-N{\'u}{\~n}ez and Anna Popova and Olivia Rahn and Alexey Reshchikov and Antonio Rodriguez-Campbell and Seppo Rytk{\"o}nen and Katerina Sam and Antigoni Sounapoglou and Robert Tropek and Cheng Wenda and Guorui Xu and Yu Zeng and Maxim Zolotarev and Natalia A Zubrii and Vitali Zverev and Mikhail V Kozlov",

note = "Funding Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00239%2F2020/PT# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/Financiamento do Plano Estrat{\'e}gico de Unidades de I&D - 2019/UID%2FAGR%2F00239%2F2019/PT# UID/AMB/04085/2020. Funding: This work was supported by the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund; Biotieteiden ja Ymp\u00E4rist\u00F6n Tutkimuksen Toimikunta, 316182; Yunnan Intelligence Union Program, 202203AM140015; Carl Tryggers Stiftelse f\u00F6r Vetenskaplig Forskning, CTS21: 1585; MITACS Globalink; Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, FUUW-2022-0039; The National Natural Science Foundation of China, 32161160324, 32301457 and 42111530066; Grantov\u00E1 Agentura \u010Cesk\u00E9 Republiky, 21-00828S, 21-24186M and 22-17593M; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant; The study was supported by the Academy of Finland, Project 316182 (ELZ, MVK, VZ); Carl Tryggers Stiftelse postdoctoral grant, Project no. CTS21: 1585 (BA); MITACS Globalink (ARC); Yunnan Intelligence Union Program, Project 202203 AM140015 (AR); Percy Sladen Memorial Fund (EZ); Czech Science Foundation, Projects no. 22-17593M (KS), 21-00828S (PK) and 21-24186M (JF, RT, AS); the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Project no. FUUW-2022-0039 (NZ), FCT/MCTES, Project no. UID/AMB/04085/2020, FCT, Project no. UID/AGR/00239/2019 and UIDB/00239/2020 (SB); the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project no. 42111530066 (GX); the National Natural Science Foundation of China International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange Project, Project no. 32161160324 (AN); the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (ALH); the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project no. 32301457 (WC). We acknowledge permissions to conduct field work on the premises of the Taunus Observatory (granted by Andreas K\u00FCrten), the University of Calgary Barrier Lake Biogeoscience Institute and UCSC Campus Natural Reserve (granted by Alex Jones), Centre for Gardening and Horticulture, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Daintree Forest Observatory for the use of their facilities, Instituto de Ecolog\u00EDa AC for the support at the CICOLMA field station. ATM and GMC conducted their experiment under NSW scientific licence SL102685. We are grateful for assistance in fieldwork to Anika Anderson, Dominik Anyz, Jos\u00E9 Barreiro, Michal Bartak, Manuela Branco, Martin Brozak, Sarah Chaddock, Thomas Denk, Francis Luma Ewome, David Hunt, Muhammad Ilyas, Petra Janeckova, Vaclav Kodousek, Egor Kruglov, Xin Liu, Pedro Luna, McGill Biology's 331 field course, Carlos Pinilla, Brenda Ratoni, Demid Reshchikov, Pablo Stevenson and Ilja Vikhrev, and to Tomoki Kurihara, Xianhui Shen, Zoya A. Zhigulskaya and Vera Zina for ant identification. We are also grateful to four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to an earlier draft of the manuscript. {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",

year = "2024",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/geb.13899",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

journal = "Global Ecology and Biogeography",

issn = "1466-822X",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "11",

}

Zvereva, EL, Adroit, B, Andersson, T, Barnett, CRA, Branco, S, Castagneyrol, B, Chiarenza, GM, Dáttilo, W, del-Val, E, Filip, J, Griffith, J, Hargreaves, AL, Hernández-Agüero, JA, Silva, ILH, Hong, Y, Kietzka, G, Klimeš, P, Koistinen, M, Kruglova, OY, Kumpula, S, Lopezosa, P, March-Salas, M, Marquis, RJ, Marusik, YM, Moles, AT, Muola, A, Murkwe, M, Nakamura, A, Olson, C, Pagani-Núñez, E, Popova, A, Rahn, O, Reshchikov, A, Rodriguez-Campbell, A, Rytkönen, S, Sam, K, Sounapoglou, A, Tropek, R, Wenda, C, Xu, G, Zeng, Y, Zolotarev, M, Zubrii, NA, Zverev, V & Kozlov, MV 2024, 'Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns', Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 33, no. 11, e13899. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13899

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns

AU - Zvereva, Elena L

AU - Adroit, Benjamin

AU - Andersson, Tommi

AU - Barnett, Craig R A

AU - Branco, Sofia

AU - Castagneyrol, Bastien

AU - Chiarenza, Giancarlo Maria

AU - Dáttilo, Wesley

AU - del-Val, Ek

AU - Filip, Jan

AU - Griffith, Jory

AU - Hargreaves, Anna L

AU - Hernández-Agüero, Juan Antonio

AU - Silva, Isabelle L H

AU - Hong, Yixuan

AU - Kietzka, Gabriella

AU - Klimeš, Petr

AU - Koistinen, Max

AU - Kruglova, Oksana Y

AU - Kumpula, Satu

AU - Lopezosa, Paula

AU - March-Salas, Marti

AU - Marquis, Robert J

AU - Marusik, Yuri M

AU - Moles, Angela T

AU - Muola, Anne

AU - Murkwe, Mercy

AU - Nakamura, Akihiro

AU - Olson, Cameron

AU - Pagani-Núñez, Emilio

AU - Popova, Anna

AU - Rahn, Olivia

AU - Reshchikov, Alexey

AU - Rodriguez-Campbell, Antonio

AU - Rytkönen, Seppo

AU - Sam, Katerina

AU - Sounapoglou, Antigoni

AU - Tropek, Robert

AU - Wenda, Cheng

AU - Xu, Guorui

AU - Zeng, Yu

AU - Zolotarev, Maxim

AU - Zubrii, Natalia A

AU - Zverev, Vitali

AU - Kozlov, Mikhail V

N1 - Funding Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00239%2F2020/PT# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/Financiamento do Plano Estratégico de Unidades de I&D - 2019/UID%2FAGR%2F00239%2F2019/PT# UID/AMB/04085/2020. Funding: This work was supported by the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund; Biotieteiden ja Ymp\u00E4rist\u00F6n Tutkimuksen Toimikunta, 316182; Yunnan Intelligence Union Program, 202203AM140015; Carl Tryggers Stiftelse f\u00F6r Vetenskaplig Forskning, CTS21: 1585; MITACS Globalink; Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, FUUW-2022-0039; The National Natural Science Foundation of China, 32161160324, 32301457 and 42111530066; Grantov\u00E1 Agentura \u010Cesk\u00E9 Republiky, 21-00828S, 21-24186M and 22-17593M; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant; The study was supported by the Academy of Finland, Project 316182 (ELZ, MVK, VZ); Carl Tryggers Stiftelse postdoctoral grant, Project no. CTS21: 1585 (BA); MITACS Globalink (ARC); Yunnan Intelligence Union Program, Project 202203 AM140015 (AR); Percy Sladen Memorial Fund (EZ); Czech Science Foundation, Projects no. 22-17593M (KS), 21-00828S (PK) and 21-24186M (JF, RT, AS); the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Project no. FUUW-2022-0039 (NZ), FCT/MCTES, Project no. UID/AMB/04085/2020, FCT, Project no. UID/AGR/00239/2019 and UIDB/00239/2020 (SB); the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project no. 42111530066 (GX); the National Natural Science Foundation of China International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange Project, Project no. 32161160324 (AN); the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (ALH); the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project no. 32301457 (WC). We acknowledge permissions to conduct field work on the premises of the Taunus Observatory (granted by Andreas K\u00FCrten), the University of Calgary Barrier Lake Biogeoscience Institute and UCSC Campus Natural Reserve (granted by Alex Jones), Centre for Gardening and Horticulture, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Daintree Forest Observatory for the use of their facilities, Instituto de Ecolog\u00EDa AC for the support at the CICOLMA field station. ATM and GMC conducted their experiment under NSW scientific licence SL102685. We are grateful for assistance in fieldwork to Anika Anderson, Dominik Anyz, Jos\u00E9 Barreiro, Michal Bartak, Manuela Branco, Martin Brozak, Sarah Chaddock, Thomas Denk, Francis Luma Ewome, David Hunt, Muhammad Ilyas, Petra Janeckova, Vaclav Kodousek, Egor Kruglov, Xin Liu, Pedro Luna, McGill Biology's 331 field course, Carlos Pinilla, Brenda Ratoni, Demid Reshchikov, Pablo Stevenson and Ilja Vikhrev, and to Tomoki Kurihara, Xianhui Shen, Zoya A. Zhigulskaya and Vera Zina for ant identification. We are also grateful to four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to an earlier draft of the manuscript. © 2024 The Author(s). Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2024/11

Y1 - 2024/11

N2 - Aim: Long-standing theory predicts that the intensity of biotic interactions increases from high to low latitudes. Studies addressing geographic variation in predation on insect prey have often relied on prey models, which lack many characteristics of live prey. Our goals were to explore global latitudinal patterns of predator attack rates on standardised live insect prey and to compare the patterns in predation on live insects with those on plasticine prey models. Location: Global forested areas. Time Period: 2021–2023. Major Taxa: Arthropods, birds. Methods: We measured predation rates in 43 forested locations distributed across five continents from 34.1° S to 69.5° N latitude. At each location, we exposed 20 sets of three bait types, one set per tree. Each set included three live fly larvae (maggots), three live fly puparia and three plasticine models of the puparia. We used glue rings to isolate half of the sets from non-flying predators. Results: Arthropod attack rates on plasticine prey decreased linearly from low to high latitudes, whereas attack rates on maggots had a U shaped distribution, with the lowest predation rates at temperate latitudes and the highest rates at tropical and boreal latitudes. This difference emerged from intensive predator attacks on live maggots, but not on plasticine models, in boreal sites. Site-specific attack rates of arthropod predators on live and plasticine prey were not correlated. In contrast, bird attack rates on live maggots and plasticine models were positively correlated, but did not show significant latitudinal changes. Main Conclusions: Latitudinal patterns in predation differ between major groups of predators and between types of prey. Poleward decreases in both arthropod and combined arthropod and bird predation on plasticine models do not mirror patterns of predation on our live prey, the latter likely reflecting real patterns of predation risk better than do patterns of attack on artificial prey.

AB - Aim: Long-standing theory predicts that the intensity of biotic interactions increases from high to low latitudes. Studies addressing geographic variation in predation on insect prey have often relied on prey models, which lack many characteristics of live prey. Our goals were to explore global latitudinal patterns of predator attack rates on standardised live insect prey and to compare the patterns in predation on live insects with those on plasticine prey models. Location: Global forested areas. Time Period: 2021–2023. Major Taxa: Arthropods, birds. Methods: We measured predation rates in 43 forested locations distributed across five continents from 34.1° S to 69.5° N latitude. At each location, we exposed 20 sets of three bait types, one set per tree. Each set included three live fly larvae (maggots), three live fly puparia and three plasticine models of the puparia. We used glue rings to isolate half of the sets from non-flying predators. Results: Arthropod attack rates on plasticine prey decreased linearly from low to high latitudes, whereas attack rates on maggots had a U shaped distribution, with the lowest predation rates at temperate latitudes and the highest rates at tropical and boreal latitudes. This difference emerged from intensive predator attacks on live maggots, but not on plasticine models, in boreal sites. Site-specific attack rates of arthropod predators on live and plasticine prey were not correlated. In contrast, bird attack rates on live maggots and plasticine models were positively correlated, but did not show significant latitudinal changes. Main Conclusions: Latitudinal patterns in predation differ between major groups of predators and between types of prey. Poleward decreases in both arthropod and combined arthropod and bird predation on plasticine models do not mirror patterns of predation on our live prey, the latter likely reflecting real patterns of predation risk better than do patterns of attack on artificial prey.

KW - ants

KW - arthropod predation

KW - bird predation

KW - forests

KW - latitudinal pattern

KW - live standardised prey

KW - maggots

KW - plasticine prey models

KW - predation risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201267004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/geb.13899

DO - 10.1111/geb.13899

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85201267004

SN - 1466-822X

VL - 33

JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography

JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography

IS - 11

M1 - e13899

ER -

Predation on Live and Artificial Insect Prey Shows Different Global Latitudinal Patterns

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this