Portugal: The unexpected path of far left parties, from permanent opposition to government support

Elisabetta De Giorgi, Federico Russo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Given the presence of a variety of political conditions, Portugal provides an excellent opportunity to understand which factors could affect the opposition’s behaviour and determine its conduct in parliament. First, it permits us to test the effect of a systemic variable traditionally thought to affect the opposition’s behaviour, namely the executive’s type. Portugal, in fact, has experienced the alternation of majority and minority governments, which implies very different political opportunities for the opposition parties. Second, it allows us to test the difference in the behaviour of temporary and permanent opposition (at least until the 2015 election), given the presence of two mainstream parties alternating in office - the Socialist Party and the Social Democrats - and three radical left parties - the Portuguese Communist Party, the Greens and the Left Bloc - always in opposition. Finally, in recent years, it offers an insight into the impact of the economic crisis on government-opposition dynamics. We will explore the impact of the three abovementioned factors by investigating the opposition’s behaviour in Portugal in five legislative terms, namely during the three governments led by the Socialist Party (2005-2011) and the two led by the centre right coalition composed of the Social Democrats and the conservative People’s Party.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOpposition Parties in European Legislatures
Subtitle of host publicationConflict or Consensus?
EditorsElisabetta De Giorgi, Gabriella Ilonszki
Place of PublicationLondon
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781317200024
ISBN (Print)9781138674875
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Portugal: The unexpected path of far left parties, from permanent opposition to government support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this