Paradox theory and the paradox of success

Miguel Pina Cunha, Linda L. Putnam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study. Yet success, however sweet, may come at a price, namely, premature convergence on theoretical concepts, overconfidence in dominant explanations, and institutionalizing labels that protect dominant logics. We discuss the risk of paradox theory being vulnerable to the paradox of success and focus on ways to avoid narrowness in theory building.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-106
Number of pages12
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

organization
Paradox
time
Organization studies
Logic
Overconfidence
Theory building

Keywords

  • institutionalization
  • paradox
  • paradox of success
  • paradox theory
  • premature
  • process

Cite this

Cunha, Miguel Pina ; Putnam, Linda L. / Paradox theory and the paradox of success. In: Strategic Organization. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 95-106.
@article{cf64d9ab1c2d43ce995831671ae69515,
title = "Paradox theory and the paradox of success",
abstract = "The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study. Yet success, however sweet, may come at a price, namely, premature convergence on theoretical concepts, overconfidence in dominant explanations, and institutionalizing labels that protect dominant logics. We discuss the risk of paradox theory being vulnerable to the paradox of success and focus on ways to avoid narrowness in theory building.",
keywords = "institutionalization, paradox, paradox of success, paradox theory, premature, process",
author = "Cunha, {Miguel Pina} and Putnam, {Linda L.}",
note = "Funding: FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (grant nr. UID/ECO/00124/2013) and POR Lisboa (grant nr. LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722)",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476127017739536",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "95--106",
journal = "Strategic Organization",
issn = "1476-1270",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Paradox theory and the paradox of success. / Cunha, Miguel Pina; Putnam, Linda L.

In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 95-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradox theory and the paradox of success

AU - Cunha, Miguel Pina

AU - Putnam, Linda L.

N1 - Funding: FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (grant nr. UID/ECO/00124/2013) and POR Lisboa (grant nr. LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722)

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study. Yet success, however sweet, may come at a price, namely, premature convergence on theoretical concepts, overconfidence in dominant explanations, and institutionalizing labels that protect dominant logics. We discuss the risk of paradox theory being vulnerable to the paradox of success and focus on ways to avoid narrowness in theory building.

AB - The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study. Yet success, however sweet, may come at a price, namely, premature convergence on theoretical concepts, overconfidence in dominant explanations, and institutionalizing labels that protect dominant logics. We discuss the risk of paradox theory being vulnerable to the paradox of success and focus on ways to avoid narrowness in theory building.

KW - institutionalization

KW - paradox

KW - paradox of success

KW - paradox theory

KW - premature

KW - process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058620009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476127017739536

DO - 10.1177/1476127017739536

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 95

EP - 106

JO - Strategic Organization

JF - Strategic Organization

SN - 1476-1270

IS - 1

ER -