Organizational Time: A Dialectical View

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I develop 12 propositions, constituting a contribution to a dialectical view of time in organizations that synthesizes apparently opposite perspectives. To articulate them, the 'planning', 'action' and 'improvisation' strategic orientations to the 'dependent', 'independent' and 'interdependent' perspectives of the environment are related. Then these strategic orientations are related to approaches to the problems of scheduling, synchronization and time allocation. 'Action' strategies rely on event time to handle scheduling, use entrainment to synchronize with their environment and view time as linear. 'Planning' strategies use even time to handle scheduling, impose their internal pacing upon the environment and view time as cyclic. Improvisational strategies use 'even-event' time to handle scheduling, synchronize via 'internal-external' pacing and hold a spiral view of time. The argument strengthens the case for a more deliberate approach to time in organizations and favours a dialectical view of organizational phenomena.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-296
Number of pages26
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume11
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Scheduling
Planning
Synchronization

Keywords

  • Action
  • Contingency
  • Dialectics
  • Improvisation
  • Planning
  • Synthesis
  • Time

Cite this

@article{2ced4ef0f79249c882e71414668dd0f5,
title = "Organizational Time: A Dialectical View",
abstract = "I develop 12 propositions, constituting a contribution to a dialectical view of time in organizations that synthesizes apparently opposite perspectives. To articulate them, the 'planning', 'action' and 'improvisation' strategic orientations to the 'dependent', 'independent' and 'interdependent' perspectives of the environment are related. Then these strategic orientations are related to approaches to the problems of scheduling, synchronization and time allocation. 'Action' strategies rely on event time to handle scheduling, use entrainment to synchronize with their environment and view time as linear. 'Planning' strategies use even time to handle scheduling, impose their internal pacing upon the environment and view time as cyclic. Improvisational strategies use 'even-event' time to handle scheduling, synchronize via 'internal-external' pacing and hold a spiral view of time. The argument strengthens the case for a more deliberate approach to time in organizations and favours a dialectical view of organizational phenomena.",
keywords = "Action, Contingency, Dialectics, Improvisation, Planning, Synthesis, Time",
author = "Cunha, {Miguel Pina}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "271--296",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications (UK and US)",
number = "2",

}

Organizational Time: A Dialectical View. / Cunha, Miguel Pina.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.03.2004, p. 271-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational Time: A Dialectical View

AU - Cunha, Miguel Pina

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - I develop 12 propositions, constituting a contribution to a dialectical view of time in organizations that synthesizes apparently opposite perspectives. To articulate them, the 'planning', 'action' and 'improvisation' strategic orientations to the 'dependent', 'independent' and 'interdependent' perspectives of the environment are related. Then these strategic orientations are related to approaches to the problems of scheduling, synchronization and time allocation. 'Action' strategies rely on event time to handle scheduling, use entrainment to synchronize with their environment and view time as linear. 'Planning' strategies use even time to handle scheduling, impose their internal pacing upon the environment and view time as cyclic. Improvisational strategies use 'even-event' time to handle scheduling, synchronize via 'internal-external' pacing and hold a spiral view of time. The argument strengthens the case for a more deliberate approach to time in organizations and favours a dialectical view of organizational phenomena.

AB - I develop 12 propositions, constituting a contribution to a dialectical view of time in organizations that synthesizes apparently opposite perspectives. To articulate them, the 'planning', 'action' and 'improvisation' strategic orientations to the 'dependent', 'independent' and 'interdependent' perspectives of the environment are related. Then these strategic orientations are related to approaches to the problems of scheduling, synchronization and time allocation. 'Action' strategies rely on event time to handle scheduling, use entrainment to synchronize with their environment and view time as linear. 'Planning' strategies use even time to handle scheduling, impose their internal pacing upon the environment and view time as cyclic. Improvisational strategies use 'even-event' time to handle scheduling, synchronize via 'internal-external' pacing and hold a spiral view of time. The argument strengthens the case for a more deliberate approach to time in organizations and favours a dialectical view of organizational phenomena.

KW - Action

KW - Contingency

KW - Dialectics

KW - Improvisation

KW - Planning

KW - Synthesis

KW - Time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642351692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 271

EP - 296

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 2

ER -