Abstract
This paper compares Kent Bach’s peculiar version of semantic minimalism with the most radical form of contextualism in philosophy of language: Charles Travis’s occasion-sensitivity. Bach posits a distinction between a contextually insensitive semantic notion of what is said in an utterance and the pragmatically enriched content a speaker can communicate with it, whereas Travis refuses to isolate the content of what is said in an utterance from the act of uttering it. I will argue that Bach’s content dualism fails precisely as a result of its willingness to ascribe “pure semantic content” to an entity that is structurally pragmatic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-92 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía |
Volume | 69 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Minimalism
- Occasion-sensitivity
- Semantics/pragmatics divide
- Minimal propositions
- Pragmatic Frame