Nondestructive Testing of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites: An Experimental Critical Comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials produced by additive manufacturing are a promising solution with several applications in industry. The presence of defects due to fabrication could undermine the performance of the component structure. PMC performance has been extensively studied using destructive tests, but reliable nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques are essential. In this study, PMC with unidirectional fibers were 3D printed with an adapted conventional fused filament fabrication printer. The matrix material was polylactic acid, and three different reinforcement fibers were used: Kevlar (R), carbon, and glass fibers. The samples were 3D printed with artificial defects, to simulate delamination's 0.5mm thick. Four NDT techniques were explored, benchmarking the inspection of PMC envisaging an automated noncontact imaging inspection for easier result interpretation. Active pulse thermography, air-coupled ultrasounds, continuous wave terahertz, and digital X-ray were the techniques chosen, and a critical comparison is presented, evaluating the performance of each technique in the detection of defects. NDT technique diversity, complementarity, and redundancy improve inspection reliability, as there is not a single inspection technique that can cover all material defects or characteristics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1196-e1208
Number of pages13
Journal3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date27 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Active pulse thermography
  • Air-coupled ultrasound
  • Contactless inspection
  • Fiber-reinforced polymeric composite
  • Nondestructive testing
  • Terahertz

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nondestructive Testing of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites: An Experimental Critical Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this