TY - JOUR
T1 - Nondestructive Testing of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites
T2 - An Experimental Critical Comparison
AU - Silva, Henrique V.
AU - Catapirra, Nuno P.
AU - Carvalho, Marta S.
AU - Santos, Telmo G.
AU - Machado, Miguel A.
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00667%2F2020/PT#
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials produced by additive manufacturing are a promising solution with several applications in industry. The presence of defects due to fabrication could undermine the performance of the component structure. PMC performance has been extensively studied using destructive tests, but reliable nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques are essential. In this study, PMC with unidirectional fibers were 3D printed with an adapted conventional fused filament fabrication printer. The matrix material was polylactic acid, and three different reinforcement fibers were used: Kevlar (R), carbon, and glass fibers. The samples were 3D printed with artificial defects, to simulate delamination's 0.5mm thick. Four NDT techniques were explored, benchmarking the inspection of PMC envisaging an automated noncontact imaging inspection for easier result interpretation. Active pulse thermography, air-coupled ultrasounds, continuous wave terahertz, and digital X-ray were the techniques chosen, and a critical comparison is presented, evaluating the performance of each technique in the detection of defects. NDT technique diversity, complementarity, and redundancy improve inspection reliability, as there is not a single inspection technique that can cover all material defects or characteristics.
AB - Polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials produced by additive manufacturing are a promising solution with several applications in industry. The presence of defects due to fabrication could undermine the performance of the component structure. PMC performance has been extensively studied using destructive tests, but reliable nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques are essential. In this study, PMC with unidirectional fibers were 3D printed with an adapted conventional fused filament fabrication printer. The matrix material was polylactic acid, and three different reinforcement fibers were used: Kevlar (R), carbon, and glass fibers. The samples were 3D printed with artificial defects, to simulate delamination's 0.5mm thick. Four NDT techniques were explored, benchmarking the inspection of PMC envisaging an automated noncontact imaging inspection for easier result interpretation. Active pulse thermography, air-coupled ultrasounds, continuous wave terahertz, and digital X-ray were the techniques chosen, and a critical comparison is presented, evaluating the performance of each technique in the detection of defects. NDT technique diversity, complementarity, and redundancy improve inspection reliability, as there is not a single inspection technique that can cover all material defects or characteristics.
KW - Active pulse thermography
KW - Air-coupled ultrasound
KW - Contactless inspection
KW - Fiber-reinforced polymeric composite
KW - Nondestructive testing
KW - Terahertz
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171618240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=nova_api&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000982852900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1089/3dp.2022.0291
DO - 10.1089/3dp.2022.0291
M3 - Article
SN - 2329-7662
VL - 11
SP - e1196-e1208
JO - 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
JF - 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
IS - 3
ER -