Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis

Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services

Heli Saarikoski, Jyri Mustajoki, David Nicholas Barton, Davide Geneletti, Johannes Langemeyer, Erik Gomez-Baggethun, Mika Marttunen, Paula Antunes, Hans Keune, Rui Ferreira dos Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods has been promoted as an alternative approach to monetary economic valuation of ecosystem services in Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (CBA). We discuss the potential of MCDA in providing a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. We conclude that MCDA does in general perform better than CBA and associated monetary valuation techniques in several aspects that are essential in ecosystem service valuation. These include the ability of a valuation method to account for multiple dimensions of well-being, including ecological and economic as well as cultural and moral aspects of a policy or management problem and to facilitate open and transparent public debate on the pros and cons of alternative courses of action, including the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries of ecosystem services. The capacity of MCDA to articulate values related to ecosystem services depends on individual methods used in the MCDA process. More importantly, it depends of the ways in which the process is organized and facilitated. However, MCDA cannot provide representative information of the values of wider population. Further empirical and theoretical research is needed on the potential of hybrid methodologies to combine monetary valuation and MCDA in fruitful ways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-249
Number of pages12
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume22
Issue numberPart B
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

multi-criteria decision making
decision analysis
cost benefit analysis
Decision Support Techniques
cost-benefit analysis
valuation
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Ecosystem
Economics
methodology
Empirical Research
process analysis
economic valuation
economics
Values
well-being
ability

Keywords

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Ecosystem services
  • Integrated valuation
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
  • Non-monetary valuation

Cite this

Saarikoski, Heli ; Mustajoki, Jyri ; Barton, David Nicholas ; Geneletti, Davide ; Langemeyer, Johannes ; Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ; Marttunen, Mika ; Antunes, Paula ; Keune, Hans ; Ferreira dos Santos, Rui. / Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis : Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. In: Ecosystem Services. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. Part B. pp. 238-249.
@article{f6c862f1fa0c4f77ae92b4d4db29315d,
title = "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services",
abstract = "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods has been promoted as an alternative approach to monetary economic valuation of ecosystem services in Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (CBA). We discuss the potential of MCDA in providing a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. We conclude that MCDA does in general perform better than CBA and associated monetary valuation techniques in several aspects that are essential in ecosystem service valuation. These include the ability of a valuation method to account for multiple dimensions of well-being, including ecological and economic as well as cultural and moral aspects of a policy or management problem and to facilitate open and transparent public debate on the pros and cons of alternative courses of action, including the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries of ecosystem services. The capacity of MCDA to articulate values related to ecosystem services depends on individual methods used in the MCDA process. More importantly, it depends of the ways in which the process is organized and facilitated. However, MCDA cannot provide representative information of the values of wider population. Further empirical and theoretical research is needed on the potential of hybrid methodologies to combine monetary valuation and MCDA in fruitful ways.",
keywords = "Cost-Benefit Analysis, Ecosystem services, Integrated valuation, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Non-monetary valuation",
author = "Heli Saarikoski and Jyri Mustajoki and Barton, {David Nicholas} and Davide Geneletti and Johannes Langemeyer and Erik Gomez-Baggethun and Mika Marttunen and Paula Antunes and Hans Keune and {Ferreira dos Santos}, Rui",
note = "Sem PDF conforme despacho. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308428/EU# This work was supported by the OpenNESS project (Operationalisation of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services: From Concepts to Real-world Applications), funded from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-ENV.2012.6.2-1) under Grant agreement no. 308428. Heli Saarikoski and Jyri Mustajoki also acknowledge the financial support of the Academy of Finland (Project 275772).",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "238--249",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "Part B",

}

Saarikoski, H, Mustajoki, J, Barton, DN, Geneletti, D, Langemeyer, J, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Marttunen, M, Antunes, P, Keune, H & Ferreira dos Santos, R 2016, 'Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services', Ecosystem Services, vol. 22, no. Part B, pp. 238-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis : Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. / Saarikoski, Heli; Mustajoki, Jyri; Barton, David Nicholas; Geneletti, Davide; Langemeyer, Johannes; Gomez-Baggethun, Erik; Marttunen, Mika; Antunes, Paula; Keune, Hans; Ferreira dos Santos, Rui.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 22, No. Part B, 01.12.2016, p. 238-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis

T2 - Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services

AU - Saarikoski, Heli

AU - Mustajoki, Jyri

AU - Barton, David Nicholas

AU - Geneletti, Davide

AU - Langemeyer, Johannes

AU - Gomez-Baggethun, Erik

AU - Marttunen, Mika

AU - Antunes, Paula

AU - Keune, Hans

AU - Ferreira dos Santos, Rui

N1 - Sem PDF conforme despacho. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308428/EU# This work was supported by the OpenNESS project (Operationalisation of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services: From Concepts to Real-world Applications), funded from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-ENV.2012.6.2-1) under Grant agreement no. 308428. Heli Saarikoski and Jyri Mustajoki also acknowledge the financial support of the Academy of Finland (Project 275772).

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods has been promoted as an alternative approach to monetary economic valuation of ecosystem services in Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (CBA). We discuss the potential of MCDA in providing a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. We conclude that MCDA does in general perform better than CBA and associated monetary valuation techniques in several aspects that are essential in ecosystem service valuation. These include the ability of a valuation method to account for multiple dimensions of well-being, including ecological and economic as well as cultural and moral aspects of a policy or management problem and to facilitate open and transparent public debate on the pros and cons of alternative courses of action, including the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries of ecosystem services. The capacity of MCDA to articulate values related to ecosystem services depends on individual methods used in the MCDA process. More importantly, it depends of the ways in which the process is organized and facilitated. However, MCDA cannot provide representative information of the values of wider population. Further empirical and theoretical research is needed on the potential of hybrid methodologies to combine monetary valuation and MCDA in fruitful ways.

AB - Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods has been promoted as an alternative approach to monetary economic valuation of ecosystem services in Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (CBA). We discuss the potential of MCDA in providing a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. We conclude that MCDA does in general perform better than CBA and associated monetary valuation techniques in several aspects that are essential in ecosystem service valuation. These include the ability of a valuation method to account for multiple dimensions of well-being, including ecological and economic as well as cultural and moral aspects of a policy or management problem and to facilitate open and transparent public debate on the pros and cons of alternative courses of action, including the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries of ecosystem services. The capacity of MCDA to articulate values related to ecosystem services depends on individual methods used in the MCDA process. More importantly, it depends of the ways in which the process is organized and facilitated. However, MCDA cannot provide representative information of the values of wider population. Further empirical and theoretical research is needed on the potential of hybrid methodologies to combine monetary valuation and MCDA in fruitful ways.

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Integrated valuation

KW - Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

KW - Non-monetary valuation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006662268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 238

EP - 249

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

IS - Part B

ER -